|
Post by plutronus on Jul 29, 2021 0:00:36 GMT
While I did in my early adult years study meteorology (weather) science, and it is a fascinating science, heh, however, there is little to no money in the subject. Fortunately, other science subjects caught my interest and now its just history that I acquired a degree in computer engineering in 1972. But foremost I'm an electronics engineer who can also write software, so I tell folks that I'm hardware/software engineer, but realistically I'm mainly an electronics weenie. Another of my early interests was that of primate anthropology, with focus in pre-history Human studies. Recently I studied some college level chemistry, as I was out-classed to debate the subject with a dirty power babbler who believes that the little power-wall-warts that USB charge cellphones, cause cancer, remotely. So, I guess that makes me an all around 'nerdo'. Heck, I was a nerd before it was popular to be a nerd.
But I wander from the point of this post, regarding 'global-warming' which definantly seems to exhibit some validity, --there is strange weather transpiring all over the planet, but what many people miss re; the subject is the that Earth's weather 'system' is a closed-loop system. In an air-conditioner for instance, there is a hot side and a cold side, you can't have one without the other, its the physics law of energy conservation. The Earth is much more complicated due to its size, mass and the sun. The environment exhibits 'inertia' and so things may not instantly occur, but years later. Humans have not been taking quality data long enough to know what's truely happening. Only time will reveal the truth.
I'm also an Extra-Class Amateur Radio Operator, aka an Extra-Class 'Ham Operator'. Its not anything like CB radio, where people are supposed to pay a license fee to attain the legal right to use the transmitter (most just skip the license and fee part), while in ham radio, one is required to take a lengthy technical and operational rules test depending upon the desired class of operation. Prior to 1995, all of the ham class tests required being able to send and receive Morse Code at various speeds, also dependent upon desired operational license class. In 1995 that requirement was eliminated, now all one need do is pass the technical test.
For instance, currently, the FCC regulates, essentially (some carry overs from previous times) three classes of ham radio licensing:
1) Technician-Class (35 test questions selected out of a pool of 432 questions, of which a score of 82 is minimum for passage),
2) General-Class (35 test questions selected out of a pool of 475 questions, of which a score of 82 is minimum for passage) and
3) Extra-Class (42 test questions selected out of a pool of 565 questions, formulas, schematic drawings requiring a minimum score of 82 for passage)
Sounds easy, but no one knows which of the 400+ questions will be included on the test, so one need to be able to accurately answer ALL of the 400+ questions.
The tests are non-trivial, a surprising number of people fail to pass both the General and-or Extra-Class tests, repeatedly. One must pass all three in ascending order, but not necessarily in the same test sessions. I took each test a couple of weeks apart, passing all on the first try.
To be able to work in the industrial segment of broadcast radio one must attain an FCC First Class License. It is a tough test. Too many wokesters in HollyLGBTQwood for my tastes. Who desires to work with guys sitting around in the lunch room with their hands in each other's pants? Try to do that with your lady sometime in public view. Is that normal behavior in any public social setting?
In ham radio, amateur radio operators rely on the sun to ionize the ionosphere, it is a necessary natural element for the proper operation of long distance (non-satellite transmission extension or long range InterNet repeater linkage) radio 'skip' transmission. The greater the sun's activity, the greater the ionospheric ionization and the greater the distance of radio wave skippage off of the ionosphere.
Lately, the sun has been uncharacteristically quiet and as result many of the amateur radio bands are essentially unusable. 160 meters, 80 meters, 40 meters, etc. I frequent the 20 meter band as do many ham operators the world over, as it is usable for DX skip, but it is a very crowded, noisy band. As hams we hams keep hoping that the next solar cycle will exhibit more solar-activity, eg., 'sun spots'.
However there is a dark side in this on-going solar 'quietness' and it aint global warming, but rather the diametric opposite. And it would not be the first time either, but the results would likely be very much the same aside from the fact that in this period, we are a technical civilization and are reliant on the nature of the 'normalcy' of planetary heat.
================ Beginning of Forward ================
By: Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D. - 28 Jul 2021
"Climate scientist Dr. 'Willie' Soon has urged his fellow academics to pay closer attention to the sun’s activity, which suggests several decades of global cooling rather than warming.
Speaking this week with Alex Newman of the New American, Dr. Soon, a Malaysian astrophysicist and aerospace engineer, said that “what we predict is that the next 20-30 years will be cold. It will be cold, so it will be a very interesting thing for the IPCC to confront.”
The sun is in a “weakened state” and far less active than during the 1980s and 1990s, Dr. Soon noted, which should last until “around 2050.”
“The whole climate system is powered 99.1 percent by the sun’s energy,” he stated.
Dr. Soon, a researcher at the Solar and Stellar Physics Division of the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, said that global cooling is a far greater source of concern than global warming.
“We will have a lot more problems were the planet to cool rather than warm,” Dr. Soon insisted.
Humanity can solve a lot of problems including overheating, but the problem of a “little ice age” like that of the 1700s, “those problems are much harder to solve,” he said.
“If you want to face a serious problem, worry about an ice age; never worry about global warming,” he declared.
Dr. Soon’s warnings dovetail with a report Wednesday of billions of dollars of Chinese investment into elite American universities to promote climate alarmism as “one of the Chinese Communist Party’s chief weapons against the United States of America.”
The U.S. State Department uncovered $6.5 billion in undeclared university, most of which came from China, in an attempt to “project ‘soft power,’ steal sensitive and proprietary research and development data and other intellectual property, and spread propaganda benefitting foreign governments.”
“It makes perfect sense that the Chinese Communists are manipulating fears of a climate catastrophe to its advantage,” the report noted. “The CCP wants the U.S. and other nations to pass laws making energy and manufacturing more expensive while they expand their economy, take our industries and our jobs and do so with little regard for the environment or human rights.”
“It is a strategic geopolitical tool used by China and other nations that want to weaken America, and the freedoms we enjoy,” it said. "
Follow @tdwilliamsrome""
================ end of forward ==============
And then we got those f'n commies...something to consider...
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by theophulus on Aug 6, 2021 15:29:19 GMT
Taking the IPCC's word for anything is like taking anything Biden says as gospel truth and accurate!
|
|
|
Post by purr on Aug 7, 2021 8:23:05 GMT
Taking the IPCC's word for anything is like taking anything Biden says as gospel truth and accurate! Welcome back Theophulus! Once more a lone gun is watching over us. I fear of preaching to the converted here: but I guess the real problem is secret knowledge pertaining to future climate catastrophe. A dreadful probable future conceivably foreshadowed by weird wobbles in weather and Earth temperatures. Global Warming Theory (anthropogenic) imo has been the soothing coverstory keeping mankind from asking why. GW gives the world public a sense of control over what is way beyond our control. purr
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Aug 11, 2021 19:16:56 GMT
The 2021 IPCC Report: What You Need To KnowPosted by
EarthSky Voices August 10, 2021
Pep Canadell, CSIRO; Joelle Gergis, Australian National University; Malte Meinshausen, The University of Melbourne; Mark Hemer, CSIRO, Michael Grose, CSIRO
Earth has warmed 1.09 C (1.96 F) since pre-industrial times and many changes such as sea-level rise and glacier melt are now virtually irreversible, according to the most sobering report yet by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The report also found escape from human-caused climate change is no longer possible. Climate change is now affecting every continent, region and ocean on Earth, and every facet of the weather.
The long-awaited report is the sixth assessment of its kind since the panel was formed in 1988. It will give world leaders the most timely, accurate information about climate change ahead of a crucial international summit in Glasgow, Scotland, in November.
The IPCC is the peak climate science body of the United Nations and the World Meteorological Organization. It is the global authority on the state of Earth’s climate and how human activities affect it. We are authors of the latest IPCC report and have drawn from the work of thousands of scientists from around the world to produce this new assessment.
Sadly, there is hardly any good news in the 3,900 pages of text released on August 9, 2021. But there is still time to avert the worst damage, if humanity chooses to.
It’s unequivocal: humans are warming the planet
For the first time, the IPCC states unequivocally – leaving absolutely no room for doubt – that humans are responsible for the observed warming of the atmosphere, lands and oceans.
The IPCC finds Earth’s global surface temperature warmed 1.09 C (1.96 F) between 1850-1900 and the last decade. This is 0.29 C (0.52 F) warmer than in the previous IPCC report in 2013. (It should be noted that 0.1 C of the increase is due to data improvements.)
The IPCC recognizes the role of natural changes to the Earth’s climate. However, it finds 1.07 C of the 1.09 C (0.93 F of the 0.96 F) warming is due to greenhouse gases associated with human activities. In other words, pretty much all global warming is due to humans.
Global surface temperature has warmed faster since 1970 than in any other 50-year period over at least the last 2,000 years, with the warming also reaching ocean depths below 2,000 meters.
The IPCC says human activities have also affected global precipitation (rain and snow). Since 1950, total global precipitation has increased, but while some regions have become wetter, others have become drier.
The frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation events have increased over most land areas. This is because the warmer atmosphere is able to hold more moisture – about 7% more for each additional degree of temperature – which makes wet seasons and rainfall events wetter.
Higher concentrations of carbon dioxide, growing faster
Present-day global concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide are higher and rising faster than at any time in at least the past two million years.
The speed at which atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased since the industrial revolution (1750) is at least ten times faster than at any other time during the last 800,000 years, and between four and five times faster than during the last 56 million years.
About 85% of carbon-dioxide emissions are from burning fossil fuels. The remaining 15% are generated from land use change, such as deforestation and degradation.
Concentrations of other greenhouse gases are not doing any better. Both methane and nitrous oxide, the second and third biggest contributors to global warming after carbon dioxide, have also increased more quickly.
Methane emissions from human activities largely come from livestock and the fossil fuel industry. Nitrous oxide emissions largely come from the use of nitrogen fertilizer on crops.
Extreme weather on the rise
Hot extremes, heatwaves and heavy rain have also become more frequent and intense across most land regions since 1950, the IPCC confirms.
The report highlights that some recently observed hot extremes, such as the Australian summer of 2012–2013, would have been extremely unlikely without human influence on the climate
Human influence has also been detected for the first time in compounded extreme events. For example, incidences of heatwaves, droughts and fire weather happening at the same time are now more frequent. These compound events have been seen in Australia, Southern Europe, Northern Eurasia, parts of the Americas and African tropical forests.
Oceans: hotter, higher and more acidic
Oceans absorb 91% of the energy from the increased atmospheric greenhouse gases. This has led to ocean warming and more marine heatwaves, particularly over the past 15 years.
Marine heat waves cause the mass death of marine life, such as from coral bleaching events. They also cause algal blooms and shifts in the composition of species. Even if the world restricts warming to 1.5-2 C (2.7-3.6 F), as is consistent with the Paris Agreement, marine heatwaves will become four times more frequent by the end of the century.
Melting ice sheets and glaciers, along with the expansion of the ocean as it warms, have led to a global mean sea level increase of 6 inches (0.2 meters) between 1901 and 2018. But, importantly, the speed sea level is rising is accelerating: 0.05 inches (1.3 mm) per year during 1901-1971, 0.07 inches (1.9 mm) per year during 1971-2006, and 0.14 inches (3.7 mm) per year during 2006-2018
Ocean acidification, caused by the uptake of carbon dioxide, has occurred over all oceans and is reaching depths beyond 6,500 feet (2,000 m) in the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic.
Many changes are already irreversible
The IPCC says if Earth’s climate was stabilized soon, some climate change-induced damage could not be reversed within centuries, or even millennia. For example, global warming of 2 C (3.6 F) this century will lead to average global sea level rise of between 6.5 and 19.5 feet (2 and 6 m) over 2,000 years, and much more for higher emission scenarios
Globally, glaciers have been synchronously retreating since 1950 and are projected to continue to melt for decades after the global temperature is stabilized. Meanwhile the acidification of the deep ocean will remain for thousands of years after carbon-dioxide emissions cease.
The report does not identify any possible abrupt changes that would lead to an acceleration of global warming during this century – but does not rule out such possibilities.
The prospect of permafrost (frozen soils) in Alaska, Canada and Russia crossing a tipping point has been widely discussed. The concern is that as frozen ground thaws, large amounts of carbon accumulated over thousands of years from dead plants and animals could be released as they decompose.
The report does not identify any globally significant abrupt change in these regions over this century, based on currently available evidence. However, it projects permafrost areas will release about 66 billion tons of carbon dioxide for each additional degree of warming. These emissions are irreversible during this century under all warming scenarios.
How we can stabilize the climate
Earth’s surface temperature will continue to increase until at least 2050 under all emissions scenarios considered in the report. The assessment shows Earth could well exceed the 1.5 C (2.7 F) warming limit by early 2030s.
If we reduce emissions sufficiently, there is only a 50% chance global temperature rise will stay around 1.5 C (including a temporary overshoot of up to 0.1 C). To get Earth back to below 1.5 C warming, carbon dioxide would need to be removed from the atmosphere using negative emissions technologies or nature-based solutions.
Global warming stays below 2 C (3.6 F) during this century only under scenarios where carbon-dioxide emissions reach net-zero around or after 2050.
The IPCC analyzed future climate projections from dozens of climate models, produced by more than 50 modeling centers around the world. It showed global average surface temperature rises between 1-1.8 C and 3.3-5.7 C this century above pre-industrial levels for the lowest and highest emission scenarios, respectively. The exact increase the world experiences will depend on how much more greenhouse gases are emitted.
The 2021 IPCC report recommendations
The report states, with high certainty, that to stabilize the climate, carbon-dioxide emissions must reach net zero, and other greenhouse gas emissions must decline significantly.
We also know, for a given temperature target, there’s a finite amount of carbon we can emit before reaching net zero emissions. To have a 50:50 chance of halting warming at around 1.5 C, this quantity is about 500 billion tons of carbon dioxide.
At current levels of carbon-dioxide emissions this “carbon budget” would be used up within 12 years. Exhausting the budget will take longer if emissions begin to decline.
The IPCC’s latest findings are alarming. But no physical or environmental impediments exist to hold warming to well below 2 C (3.6 F) and limit it to around 1.5 C (2.7 F), the globally agreed goals of the Paris Agreement. Humanity, however, must choose to act.
Pep Canadell, Chief research scientist, Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere; and Executive Director, Global Carbon Project, CSIRO; Joelle Gergis, Senior Lecturer in Climate Science, Australian National University; Malte Meinshausen, A/Prof., School of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne; Mark Hemer, Principal Research Scientist, Oceans and Atmosphere, CSIRO, and Michael Grose, Climate projections scientist, CSIRO
Bottom line: The 2021 IPCC report released August 9, 2021, lays out the stark reality of climate change. Learn where we are headed and what we can do to prepare.
Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
earthsky.org/earth/the-2021-ipcc-report-what-you-need-to-know/?utm_source=EarthSky+News&utm_campaign=7394b76198-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_02_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c643945d79-7394b76198-394368745
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Aug 12, 2021 15:19:14 GMT
The other side of the argument.....
Scientists challenge 'alarm bells' in IPCC climate change report: 'Not the end of the world'
The United Nations called the report a 'code red' for humanity
By Fox News Staff | Fox New
In the first release of a three-part report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned this week of the consequences of a rapidly warming world spurred largely by human-influenced climate change.
"The alarm bells are deafening, and the evidence is irrefutable: greenhouse‑gas emissions from fossil-fuel burning and deforestation are choking our planet and putting billions of people at immediate risk," United Nations General Secretary Antonio Guterres said. "Global heating is affecting every region on Earth, with many of the changes becoming irreversible."
But, not everyone agrees with Guterres and the panel’s nearly 4,000-page Sixth Assessment Report.
"The IPCC is an excellent source for climate science, but we tend to focus very selectively on the worst news, often overstating the effects of climate change on extreme weather events. Often adaptation is ignored, although it can alleviate much or sometimes almost all of climate damages," Bjorn Lomborg, president of the Copenhagen Consensus and visiting fellow at Stanford University's Hoover institution, said in an emailed statement to Fox News on Wednesday.
"Although climate change in total has negative impacts, we rarely hear about the positive impacts, such as a profound global greening of the planet, equivalent to two more continents of green, each the size of Australia."
Lomborg wrote in a New York Post article on Monday urging readings not to buy alarmism and "scare stories on climate impacts," and that the U.N. has "a long history of claiming catastrophe is right around the corner," writing about problems related to "one-sided" and negative thinking on climate change. Lomborg said that while climate change is a "real problem that we should fix smartly," it won’t be as catastrophic as some present it to be and that humans’ adaptive capacities are not properly being taken into account.
The IPCC report is compiled by more than 200 of the world’s leading climate scientists from 66 countries, including research from thousands of papers. The last one was released in 2013.
It says global temperatures have reached their highest level in more than 100,000 years, rising by 1.1 degrees Celsius since the 19th century, with almost all warming since pre-industrial times caused by the release of heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide and methane
As temperatures rise, the scientists note that ice melt and sea level rise have been accelerating, with extreme weather events like rainfall and drought also expected to worsen and become more frequent as further warming is "locked in."
The 2015 Paris climate accord target of limiting global warming to an increase of 2 degrees Celsius by the year 2100 – ideally, an increase of no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius – is practically unattainable according to five scenarios in which scientists all concluded that the world would see an increase of 1.5 degrees Celsius in the 2030s. Three of the scenarios saw temperatures rise by 2 degrees Celsius.
"The whole notion is just built on this assumption that warming is bad to start with," former Trump/Pence EPA Transition Team member and JunkScience.com founder Steve Milloy told Fox News on Wednesday, calling the report’s extreme weather claims "very unlikely."
"This new report, number one, there’s nothing new in it. There’s no new science, the alarm is just, you know, it’s more ‘code red’ than it was five, six years ago – the last time they came out with one of these things," the IPCC was "backing off their most extreme projections because none of that – obviously – is going to happen."
Speaking with Fox News the same day, Competitive Enterprise Institute Center for Energy and Environment senior fellow and ICPP reviewer Patrick J. Michaels said he believes the report and its conclusions were "mired in the atmosphere of unreality."
"The U.N. has been pushing the climate story since 1988 – that’s a long time ago – when it established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. And, that panel was established specifically to provide what they call the basis for a possible treaty on climate. Any committee that is assigned such a specific assignment will do exactly as it was told. And, therefore, the composition of the [IPCC] – the authors – are selectively chosen because they know the results they are going to get," he said.
"The real reason this report is so extreme is that the previous reports have not elicited the actions that its proponents wanted," Michaels noted. "And, in fact, people are becoming increasingly tired of stories about the end of the world."
Michaels, a past president of the American Association of State Climatologists and program chair for the Committee on Applied Climatology of the American Meteorological Society, took issue with the report’s Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) modeling.
Michaels, who says he is not a climate change skeptic, said if the report had used best practice models instead the issue would have "fallen apart."
That said, the report states that CMIP6 modeling includes "new and better representation of physical, chemical and biological processes, as well as higher resolution, compared to climate models considered in previous IPCC assessment reports."
David Legates, a professor of climatology at the University of Delaware and a policy expert at the Heartland Institute, took issue with what he says is the political nature of the report.
"So, it’s a panel of government officials who have been selected by the various governments. And, of course, they all have axes to grind," the former Trump-era National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) senior official said
"So, [there are] certain things they want to say. [There are] certain things they want to guarantee. Many of these nations want to make sure that carbon dioxide is an evil gas because ‘if we can tax it we can make sure that we can get our cut of the money that they’re taking away from other people.' And so, they have a vested interest in not the science – whatever that may be – but in stating that carbon dioxide is sort of an evil gas and therefore has to be regulated and has to be controlled.
For those looking to find a glimmer of hope in the new IPCC report, researchers found that majorly catastrophic disasters or "tipping points" were of "low likelihood," including ice sheet collapses and the abrupt slowdown of ocean currents.
The report suggested that warming could be reversed through "negative emissions" – extracting more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than is added – though the term "fossil fuels" is not included in the summary or a Monday press release.
Man-made CO2 removal "leading to net negative emissions" would lower CO2 in the atmosphere, a 42-page summary of the report for policymakers said. And even if this were achieved and sustained, increases in temperature would be reversed but other climate changes would continue in the "current direction for decades to millennia."
However, the panel doesn’t explain how this could be achieved and many scientists remain skeptical of its plausibility.
Michael Shellenberger, the author of "Apocalypse Never" and founder and president of Environmental Progress, told Fox News that most of the important trends regarding climate change are currently headed in the right direction."
"Climate change is real. It’s caused by human emissions – at least a significant amount of it is. And, we should try to do something about it because – all else being equal – it’s better for temperatures to not change. But, of course, not all else is equal," he said.
"Climate change is being caused by human emissions, which are caused by humans trying to improve lives for themselves and their children. Not just through fossil fuel use but also through land-use change," he continued. "And so, you’re always looking to balance the benefits of energy consumption with the downsides. But, the trends are mostly going in the right direction."
Shellenberger said the IPCC report’s "scary" scenarios were inaccurate because there is "no possibility" that they could occur due to the usage of natural gas over coal across the world.
The environmental journalist said that while the IPCC science is "mostly fine," he highlighted that there are "some games that get played" in the panel’s reports, including "a bunch of scenarios that basically everybody acknowledges [are] not going to happen because we’re not going to increase coal use sixfold."
The report’s claim that the world is seeing more extreme weather is misleading, Shellenberger says, because it leads people to think that disasters are getting worse.
Droughts can be worsened by warmer temperatures but are explained by natural variability and high-intensity fires can be avoided by better forest management, he argued – though allowing that climate scientists can point to longer fire seasons over larger geographic areas.
Nevertheless, he said human beings are more resilient to extreme weather events and carbon emissions would go down globally over the coming decade.
"The takeaway is that climate change is not what people think it is. It is significantly outweighed by things like droughts, which are still determined by natural variables and by economic development and preparedness, and we’re just so much better prepared," he told Fox News.
"We’re more resilient to changing temperatures than we’ve ever been and it’s just not the end of the world."
www.foxnews.com/us/ipcc-climate-change-reports-claims-challenged-by-skeptics
|
|
|
Post by gus on Aug 15, 2021 21:56:10 GMT
UFOs watching our fires. The very thing that gives us oxygen is now burning and ETs know it. Siberia is burning! youtu.be/LDJtRRcJRk4
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Dec 14, 2021 15:43:24 GMT
"Alarm bells" due to Arctic record 100 degree heat in Siberia: U.N.CBSNews, Dec. 14, 2021
The United Nations on Tuesday officially recognized the 38 degrees Celsius measured in Siberia last year as a record high for the Arctic, sounding "alarm bells" about climate change.
The sweltering heat — equivalent to 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit — was seen on June 20, 2020 in the Russian town of Verkhoyansk, marking the highest temperature ever recorded above the Arctic Circle, the World Meteorological Organization said.
This is the first time the WMO has added record heat in the Arctic to its archive of extreme weather reports, and it comes amid an unprecedented wave of record temperature spikes globally, the U.N. agency said.
"This new Arctic record is one of a series of observations reported to the WMO Archive of Weather and Climate Extremes that sound the alarm bells about our changing climate," its chief, Petteri Taalas, said in a statement.
Verkhoyansk is about 70 miles north of the Arctic Circle and temperatures have been measured there since 1885.
The temperature, which the agency pointed out was "more befitting the Mediterranean than the Arctic", was measured at a meteorological station during an exceptionally prolonged Siberian heatwave.
The average temperatures across Arctic Siberia reached up to 10 degrees Celsius above normal for much of the summer last year, the WMO said, adding that this had fueled fires and massive sea-ice loss.
The heatwave also played a significant role in 2020 being designated one of the three warmest years on record globally.
Last year also saw a record high of 18.3 degrees C (64.9 Fahrenheit) for the Antarctic continent, Taalas said.
The WMO is still seeking to verify the 54.4 C (129.92 F) recorded in both 2020 and 2021 in the world's hottest place, Death Valley in California.
And its experts are working on validating a new European temperature record of 48.8 C (119.8 F) reported on the Italian island of Sicily this past summer.
The WMO's archive "has never had so many ongoing simultaneous investigations", Taalas said.
www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/alarm-bells-due-to-arctic-record-100-degree-heat-in-siberia-u-n/ar-AARNtfJ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531
|
|
|
Post by erno86 on Dec 26, 2021 19:36:58 GMT
"Melting Of The Thwaites Glacier Could Rewrite The Global Coastline"
|
|
|
Post by erno86 on Dec 27, 2021 18:33:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by erno86 on Dec 31, 2021 20:54:38 GMT
"'Doomsday Glacier': Experts Raise Alarms About Cracking Antarctic Ice Shelf"
|
|
|
Post by erno86 on Dec 31, 2021 20:59:08 GMT
Dec. 31, 2021
...............................Weather WARNING!!!................................
"ENHANCED SEVERE WEATHER THREAT TOMORROW"
|
|
|
Post by erno86 on Jan 1, 2022 19:03:45 GMT
....................................WEATHER WARNING!!!.............................
LIVE - EXTREME TORNADO COVERAGE - STORM CHASERS ON THE GROUND - LIVE WEATHER CHANNEL
|
|
|
Post by erno86 on Jan 1, 2022 19:56:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by erno86 on Jan 1, 2022 20:24:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by erno86 on Jan 13, 2022 20:48:11 GMT
|
|