Post by ZETAR on Nov 7, 2021 14:42:00 GMT
PROJECT 1947
REPORT FROM BRAZIL
By Dr. Olavo T. Fontes
THE AIR FORCE IS JUST AS PUZZLED
AS WE ARE ABOUT THE SAUCERS
The U.S.A. Air Force released study on unidentified aerial objects No. 1053-55, October 25, 1955, states:
"...no evidence of the popularly-termed ‘Flying Saucers’ was found." "On the basis of this study it is believed that all the unidentified aerial objects could have been explained if more complete observational data had been available." (underlines are mine)
Commenting on this report, Secretary of the U.S.A. Air Force said:
"On the basis of this study we believe that no objects such as those popularly described as flying saucers have overflown the United States. I feel certain that even the unknown three percent could have been explained as conventional phenomenon or illusions if more complete observational data had been available." (the underlines are mine)
I don’t intend to discuss whether those statements are true or wrong. However, I would like to stress the fact that even if the witnesses were fools or liars, or mistaken, they did not report weather-balloons, convertiplanes, vertical-rising jet aircrafts, shooting-stars, planets, etc. ... They spoke of metallic-looking circular objects, resembling no familiar aeroform; making no sound in their transit and glowing strangely either by night or by day; which are capable of speeds and maneuvers far beyond anything we’ve even dared hope for.
If so, how to understand those U.S.A. Air Force statements?
Here indeed is a mystery within a mystery.
I have no doubt at all that the Air Force is just as puzzled as we are about the saucers. Government officials are human beings, like us. As we know, human mind tries to interpret the unknown in terms of the known;
it has the tendency to reduce the extraordinary to an everyday pattern; to see only what it expects to see. We turn instinctively away from any new fact which doesn’t fit, and not fitting, they are rejected.
Now, if the saucers are what they seem to be, they are heresies, both to the law of gravity and to the conception that man is the king of creation.
Considering all of this, I think it’s not surprising that the "experts" from the Air Force are trying to suppress this heresy; or to explain it; or to explain it away; or to bury it.
That is the great dilemma at stake with the flying saucers: The expert says it’s impossible; the witnesses say it happened, but witnesses of course can be mistaken; and so can experts.
I believe this is a very human situation. I hope that the increasing weight and persistence of the evidence will gradually force those people to take the saucers seriously. Before the final act of the "Saucer Drama"...
The "visitor" came by night...
He certainly was curious, showing more curiosity than any other of his kind. He was not in a contemplative frame of mind, like the ones that came in the first years of the great survey. To ride quietly on the sky far above the earth was not enough, now. It may be that their interests had shifted a bit; or it may be that he was different from the other ones. Anyway, he came daringly closer to the surface of that alien place and finally decided to land. But he was cautious too, and he knew it would be unwise to be discovered. So, he selected a lonely spot to land, an island in the middle of a river in a deserted region. It was a good landing.
But he had miscalculated, for one thing: he was spotted...
MORE HERE: project1947.com/articles/fontes1.htm
SHALOM...Z
REPORT FROM BRAZIL
By Dr. Olavo T. Fontes
THE AIR FORCE IS JUST AS PUZZLED
AS WE ARE ABOUT THE SAUCERS
The U.S.A. Air Force released study on unidentified aerial objects No. 1053-55, October 25, 1955, states:
"...no evidence of the popularly-termed ‘Flying Saucers’ was found." "On the basis of this study it is believed that all the unidentified aerial objects could have been explained if more complete observational data had been available." (underlines are mine)
Commenting on this report, Secretary of the U.S.A. Air Force said:
"On the basis of this study we believe that no objects such as those popularly described as flying saucers have overflown the United States. I feel certain that even the unknown three percent could have been explained as conventional phenomenon or illusions if more complete observational data had been available." (the underlines are mine)
I don’t intend to discuss whether those statements are true or wrong. However, I would like to stress the fact that even if the witnesses were fools or liars, or mistaken, they did not report weather-balloons, convertiplanes, vertical-rising jet aircrafts, shooting-stars, planets, etc. ... They spoke of metallic-looking circular objects, resembling no familiar aeroform; making no sound in their transit and glowing strangely either by night or by day; which are capable of speeds and maneuvers far beyond anything we’ve even dared hope for.
If so, how to understand those U.S.A. Air Force statements?
Here indeed is a mystery within a mystery.
I have no doubt at all that the Air Force is just as puzzled as we are about the saucers. Government officials are human beings, like us. As we know, human mind tries to interpret the unknown in terms of the known;
it has the tendency to reduce the extraordinary to an everyday pattern; to see only what it expects to see. We turn instinctively away from any new fact which doesn’t fit, and not fitting, they are rejected.
Now, if the saucers are what they seem to be, they are heresies, both to the law of gravity and to the conception that man is the king of creation.
Considering all of this, I think it’s not surprising that the "experts" from the Air Force are trying to suppress this heresy; or to explain it; or to explain it away; or to bury it.
That is the great dilemma at stake with the flying saucers: The expert says it’s impossible; the witnesses say it happened, but witnesses of course can be mistaken; and so can experts.
I believe this is a very human situation. I hope that the increasing weight and persistence of the evidence will gradually force those people to take the saucers seriously. Before the final act of the "Saucer Drama"...
The "visitor" came by night...
He certainly was curious, showing more curiosity than any other of his kind. He was not in a contemplative frame of mind, like the ones that came in the first years of the great survey. To ride quietly on the sky far above the earth was not enough, now. It may be that their interests had shifted a bit; or it may be that he was different from the other ones. Anyway, he came daringly closer to the surface of that alien place and finally decided to land. But he was cautious too, and he knew it would be unwise to be discovered. So, he selected a lonely spot to land, an island in the middle of a river in a deserted region. It was a good landing.
But he had miscalculated, for one thing: he was spotted...
MORE HERE: project1947.com/articles/fontes1.htm
SHALOM...Z