|
Post by SysConfig on Jan 20, 2020 22:21:49 GMT
To The Moon Alice!Breathing new life into colonizing the Moon? ESA to begin producing oxygen from LUNAR DUST www.rt.com/news/478697-esa-making-oxygen-moon-dust/ The European Space Agency (ESA) has fired up its prototype oxygen plant to begin producing the element out of simulated moondust, with a view to creating a sustainable breathable air production facility on the Moon. “Being able to acquire oxygen from resources found on the Moon would obviously be hugely useful for future lunar settlers, both for breathing and in the local production of rocket fuel,” says Beth Lomax of the University of Glasgow, a researcher working on the prototype at the European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC). The current prototype is set up in a lab in Noordwijk in the Netherlands, but the next step is to begin fine-tuning, reducing the operating temperature and streamlining the design to create a portable version of the system that could one day be flown to the Moon. Based on samples brought back from the Moon over the years, it turns out that lunar regolith (moon rock) is made up of 40 to 45 percent oxygen by weight, making it the satellite’s single most abundant element, which is incredibly fortunate for future human colonization plans.However, the oxygen is bound up as oxides which take the form of minerals or glass, not the ideal form for taking a big lungful of air. In the prototype, oxygen extraction is done using molten salt electrolysis, where the lunar rocks are placed in a metal basket with calcium chloride salt which is heated to a whopping 950 degrees Celsius. The regolith somehow remains solid at this temperature, however, but by passing a current through the heated moon rock it releases the oxygen contained within. Somewhat miraculously, the regolith then becomes usable metal alloys. Researchers are now also exploring potential future uses for these metal alloys, including in lunar-based 3D printers to construct parts for lunar bases or potentially even spacecraft. For now though, the main goal is to get a functional lunar prototype ready for testing by the mid 2020s. Such projects form an integral part of NASA and the ESA’s joint future in space, as the agencies work towards “a sustained human presence on the Moon and maybe one day Mars.” However, the oxygen is bound up as oxides which take the form of minerals or glass, not the ideal form for taking a big lungful of air. In the prototype, oxygen extraction is done using molten salt electrolysis, where the lunar rocks are placed in a metal basket with calcium chloride salt which is heated to a whopping 950 degrees Celsius. The regolith somehow remains solid at this temperature, however, but by passing a current through the heated moon rock it releases the oxygen contained within. Somewhat miraculously, the regolith then becomes usable metal alloys. Researchers are now also exploring potential future uses for these metal alloys, including in lunar-based 3D printers to construct parts for lunar bases or potentially even spacecraft.
|
|
|
Post by SysConfig on Jan 21, 2020 10:52:35 GMT
UCB..We Take You There
For some odd reason...I can't stop taking my eyes off of Lucy
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Jan 21, 2020 12:19:34 GMT
Good morning!
The Charlotte Observer
Strange night flashes, vibrations and ‘humming noise’ in Ohio town spark talk of UFO
By Mark Price
January 20, 2020 08:39 AM
A strange series of color flashes that turned the night sky reddish in Bethel, Ohio, has gotten international attention, as people scramble for a good explanation.
So far, nobody seems to have one, even after a week of debate.
A doorbell video, posted on Facebook by Tim Walker, shows a series of rapid flashes that changed in color and size over 20 seconds, from white to a red that filled the horizon.
more after the jump:
www.charlotteobserver.com/latest-news/article239454993.html
Crystal
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Jan 21, 2020 12:53:10 GMT
Live Science
Were Alien Secrets Hidden in Roswell and Area 51? 'Project Blue Book' UFO Hunters Investigate.
By Mindy Weisberger 21 January 2020
Two locations are legendary among UFO seekers. One is Roswell, New Mexico, where sightings of a so-called flying saucer electrified the town in 1947. The other is Area 51 near Groom Lake, Nevada, where the U.S. government has long maintained a secret base that some say hides UFO-related technology and experiments.
Both of these mysterious and much-discussed sites are front-and-center in the second season of "Project Blue Book," the History Channel drama based on an actual U.S. Air Force program by the same name, in which teams of experts investigated reports of UFOs from 1952 to 1969.
In the new season, premiering tonight (Jan. 21), Aidan Gillen returns as Dr. J. Allen Hynek, the astrophysicist and professor who served as the real Project Blue Book program's science advisor decades ago; Hynek is known to many as the "father of UFOlogy." As Hynek and his colleagues continue their search for the truth about UFOs, they uncover new layers of government deception and cover-ups, set against the backdrop of an intensifying Cold War. At the same time, the show incorporates historic UFO stories that still stir the imagination today, according to the History Channel.
While the first season of "Project Blue Book" was an introduction to the strange phenomenon of UFOs, "the second season is about going back to the beginning, to understand where the conspiracy was," said show co-writer and executive producer Sean Jablonski. To do that, "Project Blue Book" went to Roswell, drawing from eyewitness accounts of people who lived there at the time of the alleged UFO crash and subsequent military cover-up, Jablonski told Live Science.
Though the events at Roswell took place six years before the real Project Blue Book investigation began, the story is so intertwined with America's UFO lore that the writers felt compelled to include it, said show creator, writer and co-executive producer David O'Leary.
"It's in many ways the granddaddy of UFO cases," O'Leary told Live Science.
The so-called Roswell Incident took place in July 1947. Following a thunderstorm, strange debris found northwest of Roswell was swiftly collected by military personnel at Roswell Army Air Field, according to the city's official website. A press release issued by public information officer Lt. Walter Haut on July 8, 1947, described "a flying saucer" that was now in the army's possession.
However, another press release appeared the next day, this one issued by Lt. Gen. Roger Ramey. According to the new report, the recovered object was a weather balloon.
"That was the start of the best known and well-documented UFO cover-up," according to Roswell's website.
Other episodes of "Project Blue Book" were inspired by actual locations that boast equally compelling associations with UFOs, such as the mysterious Area 51 and Skinwalker Ranch in Ballard, Utah. Another memorable case highlights multiple UFO encounters that took place not on land, but over the Atlantic Ocean, during a series of NATO maneuvers in September 1952 called Operation Mainbrace, O'Leary said.
At the center of Project Blue Book — in the series and in the Air Force program — was Hynek. He knew very early on that government officials were concealing information about UFOs from the public, "but he stayed with the program, because he was a scientist." O'Leary explained.
"This was a way for him to gain access to cases, even as he was being complicit in the cover-up itself. So it's a bit like, 'How do you expose the greatest cover-up of all time when you're a part of it?'" said O'Leary.
"See them aliens"
The real Project Blue Book ended decades ago, but public fascination with UFOs still runs high; in September 2019, more than 1.5 million people RSVP'd to a sketchy-sounding festival in Rachel, Nevada, called "Storm Area 51" (also called "Alien Stock") with the intent of breaching the perimeter of Area 51 to "see them aliens," Live Science previously reported. (Only a few thousand people actually showed up, and there was no gate-storming and no aliens in sight, according to Vox.)
Footage from U.S. Navy pilots' 2004 encounters with UFOs, recently shared online, further fueled speculation about the government's own experiences with these enigmatic sightings and how many were still being kept under wraps. Indeed, evidence surfaced in 2017 suggesting that the U.S. government had been secretly investigating UFOs since 2007.
Then, on Jan. 13 of this year, a spokesperson from the U.S. Navy's Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) confirmed the existence of at least one video and several top-secret documents regarding the 2004 UFO encounter. The spokesperson further noted that submitting these materials to public scrutiny "would cause exceptionally grave damage to the National Security of the United States."
It would seem that along with a resurgence in public interest in UFOs is a renewed recognition that the government knows more about UFOs than it's letting on, and is withholding important information, O'Leary said. For that reason, the world of "Project Blue Book" and its UFO cover-ups now seems especially relevant, Jablonski added.
"Project Blue Book, in a way, was the origin of fake news," Jablonski said. "It was the government's program to put out stories that say, 'Whatever you think you saw, you didn't see.' This notion of who controls the truth — and the fight over that — is something that probably, above all else, is what resonates today."
Season two of "Project Blue Book" airs on the History Channel beginning on Jan. 21 at 10 p.m. ET/9 p.m. CT.
www.livescience.com/project-blue-book-ufos-season-two.html
Crystal
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Jan 21, 2020 21:42:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Jan 22, 2020 12:03:48 GMT
Good morning lovely UFOCasebookers and our stealth visitors,
Phys.org
Study says that we trust our workplace robots
by Nancy Cohen , Tech Xplore 22 January 2020
The only constant is change. Presumptions harden as truth but then there is occasion to throw presumptions off the table and start again. That's the deal with information technology using AI for business and with robots unleashed in the workplace. The presumptions are that such tech is potentially harmful and that if those robots rebel against you, you're toast.
A new study has a sunnier view. People have more trust in robots. "The majority (65 percent) of workers are optimistic, excited and grateful about having robot co-workers and nearly a quarter report having a loving and gratifying relationship with AI at work," said the press release provided by Oracle.
The information comes from an annual study that Oracle runs with the research company Future Workplace. The title of the report is "Artificial Intelligence Is Winning More Hearts and Minds in the Workplace." That is quite the positive headline; is it an aggressive spin or a realistic reflection that people are so amenable to workplace AI?
Responses were taken from 8,370 employees, managers and HR leaders across 10 countries. (And why not at least ask: Whether responses would be good or negative, AI has changed the work environment and influences how human resources and managers behave in order to keep organizations on track.)
Judith Humphrey, the founder of a Toronto-based communications firm, in Fast Company had a look at the study. She thought it presented "a strong case that AI is already winning the hearts and minds of employees."
Consider technologies that remove the grunt work so that managers can turn to more creative pursuits; the technologies that teach workers how to maximize communications via imaginative digital platforms; technologies that add weight to their career portfolios as they seek promotions or new jobs.
Humphrey noted study results: "New technologies, according to respondents, will help them master new skills (36%), gain more free time (36%), and expand their current role so that it's more strategic (28%)."
With that said, people outside Oracle still may not easily accept the very thought of an employee at any company trusting a machine more than a human manager to "do the right thing" or make the right assessment.
A closer look at the survey questions, though, indicate the response was significant; the outcome had its own logic.
What, specifically, were the activities that respondents felt could be done better by robots than by their managers? These were (1) providing unbiased information, (2) maintaining work schedules, (3) problem solving and (4) managing a budget.
Increased adoption of AI at work is having an impact on the way employees interact with their managers. The traditional role of HR teams and the manager is shifting.
Oracle's press summary of the findings noted that "64 percent of people would trust a robot more than their manager and half have turned to a robot instead of their manager for advice."
As for Oracle's press release headline, "Artificial Intelligence Is Winning More Hearts and Minds in the Workplace," it is not an inaccurate spin but more a snippet from a larger thought. AI is winning more hearts and minds in the realm of what AI is good at doing, leaving room and time for managers to do what they do best, coach, motivate, inspire, build teams.
Jeanne Meister, founding partner, Future Workplace: "As workers and managers leverage the power of artificial intelligence in the workplace, they are moving from fear to enthusiasm as they see the possibility of being freed of many of their routine tasks and having more time to solve critical business problems for the enterprise."
Humphrey in Fast Company did not miss the part in the study where respondents pinned what,, on the flip side, their managers did better than robots: "understanding my feelings," "coaching me," "creating or promoting a work culture" and "evaluating team performance."
A prophetic enough article appeared back in 2016 in Harvard Business Review where the authors argued that artificial intelligence will soon be able to do the administrative tasks that consume much of managers' time faster, better, and at a lower cost.
The authors reflected on study findings at the time. The attitude was encouraging; managers could see the difference between intelligently leveraging AI for decision support and data-driven solutions as opposed to fighting AI as a threat leading to their removal, leadership skills and all.
"Writing earnings reports is one thing, but developing messages that can engage a workforce and provide a sense of purpose is human through and through," the authors wrote. "Tracking schedules and resources may soon fall within the jurisdiction of machines, but drafting strategy remains unmistakably human. Simply put, our recommendation is to adopt AI in order to automate administration and to augment but not replace human judgment."
In the Oracle study, meanwhile, workers in India (89 percent) and China (88 percent) were more trusting of robots over their managers. Singapore followed by 83 percent; Brazil, 78 percent; Japan, 76 percent; UAE, 74 percent; Australia/New Zealand, 58 percent; U.S., 57 percent; UK, 54 percent; and France, 56 percent.
techxplore.com/news/2020-01-workplace-robots.html
Crystal
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Jan 22, 2020 12:09:06 GMT
Mysterious Universe
Chinese Scientists Invent Robotic Worm That Will Burrow Into Your Brain
Paul Seaburn January 22, 2020
“You see, their young enter through the ears and wrap themselves around the cerebral cortex. This has the effect of rendering the victim extremely susceptible to suggestion… Later, as they grow, follows madness and death…”
– Khan Noonien Singh
Anyone who has ever seen Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan, the second movie in the series, can still remember the horror of Khan releasing larvae of Ceti eels into the ears of Reliant officers Commander Pavel Chekov and Captain Clark Terrell, where they wormed their way into their brains, wrapping themselves around the cerebral cortex to cause brain control, pain, madness and eventual death. It’s nice to know that’s pure fiction, right? RIGHT?
“Once you consume them, they can move throughout your body — your eyes, your tissues and most commonly your brain. They leave doctors puzzled in their wake as they migrate and settle to feed on the body they’re invading; a classic parasite, but this one can get into your head.”
According to CNN, in 2013 a British man of Chinese was found to have a tapeworm moving inside his brain in 2013 – a parasite known as Spirometra erinaceieuropaei. It’s extremely rare and found mostly in Asia – the adult parasite lives in dog and cat intestines, but the eggs can be spread via fecal matter, particularly in water, which appears to be how the man contracted it. In 2018, a man in India died after his brain, brain stem, and cerebellum were infected by the tapeworm Taenia solium. It’s a good thing these worms are rare and no one is trying to make robotic versions of them, right? RIGHT?
“It could also be implanted into the brain because its high mobility and ability to transform means it can survive in this harsh environment where there are rapid blood flows and tiny blood vessels.”
The South China Morning Post reports that scientists in Shenzhen have developed a tiny robot worm that can enter the human body, swim through along blood vessels and hook up to neurons in the brain. The 1mm-by-3mm (.04 in by .12 in) robots are powered externally by a magnetic field generator and use infrared radiation to contract their size by up to a third to squeeze through tight spots. On the noble cause side, Xu Tiantian — lead scientist for the project at the Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences – says the robot worms will allow doctors to deliver drugs directly to a specific tumor and then exit the body when done.
“But our purpose is not developing a biological weapon. It’s the opposite.”
Needless to say, using the robot worm as a weapon is entirely possible as soon as a more powerful electric field generator with a longer effective range is available and the robot worms obtain the ability to move while the host human is in motion – they currently have to be lying perfectly still. If he were around today, robot designer Khan Noonien Singh might say: “Piece of cake.”
Xu agrees.
“We just hope that day will never come.”
Or is it already here? Mr. Chekov, care to comment?
mysteriousuniverse.org/2020/01/chinese-scientists-invent-robotic-worm-that-will-burrow-into-your-brain/
Crystal
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2020 14:24:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Jan 22, 2020 15:42:29 GMT
So God Made a Farmer It was Feb. 3, 2013. The year that "The Harbaugh Bowl" took center stage. The year that a power outage suspended play for over 30 minutes. The year the Ravens beat the 49ers in Super Bowl XLVII. That was also the year that Dodge debuted their powerful So God Made a Farmer to an estimated 108 million viewers.
For two minutes, we sat and listened to a poignant speech about hard-working American farmers across the generations.
The commercial features a powerful narration by legendary broadcaster Paul Harvey. "So God Made a Farmer" was the name of a speech Harvey gave at a 1978 Future Farmers of America Convention. The speech was originally published in Harvey's syndicated column in 1986; however, it contained some phrases Harvey first wrote in an article for the Gadsden Times in 1975.
The message of the speech still rings true still today. It's one that captivated the nation with passion, value and truth. Football, for those two minutes sat quietly on the sidelines.
Here is the full text of the speech:
And on the 8th day, God looked down on his planned paradise and said, "I need a caretaker." So God made a farmer.
God said, "I need somebody willing to get up before dawn, milk cows, work all day in the fields, milk cows again, eat supper and then go to town and stay past midnight at a meeting of the school board." So God made a farmer.
"I need somebody with arms strong enough to rustle a calf and yet gentle enough to deliver his own grandchild. Somebody to call hogs, tame cantankerous machinery, come home hungry, have to wait lunch until his wife's done feeding visiting ladies and tell the ladies to be sure and come back real soon -- and mean it." So God made a farmer.
God said, "I need somebody willing to sit up all night with a newborn colt. And watch it die. Then dry his eyes and say, 'Maybe next year.' I need somebody who can shape an ax handle from a persimmon sprout, shoe a horse with a hunk of car tire, who can make harness out of haywire, feed sacks and shoe scraps. And who, planting time and harvest season, will finish his forty-hour week by Tuesday noon, then, pain'n from 'tractor back,' put in another seventy-two hours." So God made a farmer.
God had to have somebody willing to ride the ruts at double speed to get the hay in ahead of the rain clouds and yet stop in mid-field and race to help when he sees the first smoke from a neighbor's place. So God made a farmer.
God said, "I need somebody strong enough to clear trees and heave bails, yet gentle enough to tame lambs and wean pigs and tend the pink-combed pullets, who will stop his mower for an hour to splint the broken leg of a meadow lark. It had to be somebody who'd plow deep and straight and not cut corners. Somebody to seed, weed, feed, breed and rake and disc and plow and plant and tie the fleece and strain the milk and replenish the self-feeder and finish a hard week's work with a five-mile drive to church.
"Somebody who'd bale a family together with the soft strong bonds of sharing, who would laugh and then sigh, and then reply, with smiling eyes, when his son says he wants to spend his life 'doing what dad does.'" So God made a farmer.
|
|
|
Post by SysConfig on Jan 22, 2020 23:18:26 GMT
www.rt.com/news/474827-fireball-which-exploded-australia-minimoon/Australian desert FIREBALL may actually have been ‘MINIMOON,’ say scientists A fireball that exploded over the Australian desert three years ago may actually have been an extremely rare ‘minimoon,’ according to just-published research. The initially innocuous fireball was detected on August 22, 2016 thanks to a network of six cameras spanning hundreds of kilometers in total and appropriately called the Desert Fireball Network. However, now a group of researchers, led by planetary scientist Patrick Shober of Curtin University in Australia, believes that, given the object’s slow velocity and almost vertical trajectory, that it was in fact a temporarily captured orbiter or ‘minimoon,’ a natural satellite pulled in by a planet’s gravity. The object’s velocity data indicated that the space rock had been in orbit around Earth for some time before its explosive end. According to one supercomputer simulation from 2012 which used 10 million virtual asteroids, only 18,000 such objects became stuck in orbit around the simulated Earth, indicating that the phenomenon is rare indeed. So rare, in fact, that prior to this latest revelation about the Australian desert ‘minimoon,’ we only had evidence of two such Earth minimoons, that we know of. The first was called 2006 RH120, which orbited Earth between 2006 and 2007 before eventually burning up in our atmosphere.
Tungsten Rod test anyone?
|
|
|
Post by SysConfig on Jan 23, 2020 1:01:13 GMT
www.theepochtimes.com/plants-emit-ultrasonic-screams-when-stressed-study_3170053.htmlPlants Emit Ultrasonic ‘Screams’ When Stressed: StudyBy Isabel van Brugen Some plants emit a high frequency distress sound when they are placed under environmental stress, a team of researchers at Tel Aviv University in Israel has found. The team, led by Itzhak Khait, examined the sounds emitted by tomato and tobacco plants when stressed by insufficient water or when their stems are cut. Microphones recorded ultrasonic sounds between 20 and 100 kilohertz emitted by the plants in both cases, the study found. The sounds emitted by the stressed plants are at frequencies unable to be heard by humans, however the team of scientists believes “some organisms” can hear the sounds from up to several meters away. A tomato plant emitted 25 ultrasonic distress sounds in the space of an hour when its stem was cut, according to the study. In contrast, tobacco plants emitted 15 distress sounds when their stems were cut. When deprived of water, the tomato plants sent out 35 ultrasonic sounds in the course of an hour, while 11 were emitted by the tobacco plants. The team observed that the sounds released when the plants were deprived of water were louder compared to the ones when having their stems cut. In comparison, plants not placed under any environmental stress emitted less than one distress sound per hour. The authors noted that other plants and animals—and humans with the correct tools—could hear and listen to the plants’ silent screams. A moth, for example, may choose to lay its eggs elsewhere if it is able to detect that a plant is water-stressed, according to the study, which has not yet been published in a journal. In other cases, plants could react accordingly to others which lack water, the authors suggest. “These findings can alter the way we think about the plant kingdom, which has been considered to be almost silent until now,” the researchers write in their study. harvested-tomatoes The Tel Aviv University team then took the data and used it to train a machine-learning model to predict the possible frequencies plants could emit while undergoing different forms of environmental stress, such as during intense rain or wind. The team also believes other plants may release distress sounds when placed under stress. “More investigation on plant bioacoustics in general and on sound emission in plants in particular may open new avenues for understanding plants and their interactions with the environment, and it may also have a significant impact on agriculture,” the authors suggested. The notion that “sounds that drought-stressed plants make could be used in precision agriculture seems feasible if it is not too costly to set up the recording in a field situation,” Anne Visscher, a fellow in the Department of Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology at the Royal Botanic Gardens in the UK told New Scientist.
|
|
|
Post by SysConfig on Jan 23, 2020 8:43:42 GMT
www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/i-dont-see-her-beijing-or-delhi-neil-ferguson-slams-davos-virtue-signaling-greta"I Don't See Her In Beijing Or Delhi" - Niall Ferguson Slams Davos' "Virtue Signaling" Greta FanboysProfile picture for user Tyler Durden by Tyler Durden Wed, 01/22/2020 - 11:25 408 SHARES Climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the world's elite face-to-face at the World Economic Forum in Davos yesterday, admonishing the grown-ups in the room for their lack of panic: "We don't want these things done in 2050, 2030, or even 2021," Thunberg said. "We want this done now." The 17-year-old demanded participants "from all the companies, banks, institutions, and governments" in attendance to immediately halt all investments in fossil fuel exploration and extraction, end fossil fuel subsidies, and divest from all fossil fuels. "I've been warned that telling people to panic about the climate crisis is a very dangerous thing to do, but don't worry—it's fine—I've done this before and I can assure you: it doesn't lead to anything." "Our house is still on fire. Your inaction is fueling the flames by the hour. We are still telling you to panic, and to act as if you loved your children above all else." Quite a speech, and the billionaire crowd at Davos soaked it all up, proudly patting themselves on the back and supporting Greta and her 'movement'. However, as Niall Ferguson, Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, explained during a brief (and uncomfortable) interview on CNBC, it's all bullshit. "...remember there's a cognitive dissonance at the heart of Davos." "Publicly, you have to agree with Greta Thunberg and you have to be part of the virtue-signaling community on climate change, on ESG." "Privately, you're quietly agreeing with Trump." For the ultra wealthy, Ferguson said Trump remains the obvious favorite if faced with a choice between Trump and Democratic front-runners Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. “The dirty little secret of Davos 2020 is they all need him to get re-elected,” told Yahoo Finance’s Alexis Christophorus, when asked if wealthy attendees are begrudgingly rooting for President Donald Trump. “Nobody wants to say that out loud.”But the real point of note from Ferguson was his honest angst at Greta's platform of lies. "The reality is that the Green Deal [and its massive debt load] will amount to a drag on German manufacturing and the eurozone economy as a whole."
"Privately, a lot of people are admitting that Trump is doing the stuff we should be doing - fiscal stimulus."
Simply put, Ferguson dares to say that all the virtue-signaling is not in any way candid, because if it were, they would admit that
"60% of CO2 emissions since Greta Thunberg was born is attributable to China... but nobody talks about that. They talk as if its somehow Europeans and Americans who are going to fix this problem... which is frustrating because it doesn't get to the heart of the matter."
Ferguson comfortably admits that there is a climate change problem, but that's not the point. The point is what are we going to do about it, to which he asks rhetorically... " If you're serious about slowing CO2 emissions and temperatures rising it has to be China and India that are constrained."
But Greta goes to New York or Davos: "I don't see her in Beijing or Delhi." Hard to argue with "facts" and "science" that this is true... Global Warming from WHO
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Jan 23, 2020 11:36:48 GMT
"God had to have somebody willing to ride the ruts at double speed to get the hay in ahead of the rain clouds and yet stop in mid-field and race to help when he sees the first smoke from a neighbor's place. So God made a farmer."
Thank you Swamprat, beautiful.
Crystal
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Jan 23, 2020 11:39:40 GMT
Good morning lovely searchers,
UFO Sightings Sweden 2020
Jan 22, 2020
UFO 2020
~
Crystal
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2020 14:13:46 GMT
I'd say balloons tied together?
|
|