Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2020 15:15:15 GMT
It was like Trump’s campaign rally stirred up a hornets nest at MSNBC. Nothing but criticism with various panels all to show how unfit Trump is to be president. You should just watch some of these to see how bad the fake news really is. MSNBC is not a news organization it is a propaganda mouthpiece for the left. I could only watch in small doses otherwise I probably would’ve thrown something at the TV. www.msnbc.com/ Hi mrgort.... I could not stomach reading news on that site or any other mainstream media site ... I would smash my computer screen... their lies make me so angry...! However, we both know they did pretty much the same thing in 2016... non stop lies and Trump still won. They had the polls skewed as well in Hillary's favour.... yet he still won.... Do you remember all the washed up has been actors and actresses making videos condemning Trump? Made me wonder what the heck they have done that they were so afraid of Trump... and what was one of the first things Trump did when he became president... he went after paedophiles. I thought Trump's rally was fantastic. I just read a news article where AOC is having a go and mocking Republicans. I was not amused.... what goes around eventually comes around, and she will one day get hers.The Morning Briefing: Polls Are Getting Worse for Trump, Which Probably Means He Wins in a Landslide pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2020/06/19/the-morning-briefing-polls-are-getting-worse-for-trump-which-probably-means-he-wins-in-a-landslide-n551877
Of course he will win, the alternative would be hell on Earth. ... Just one read about what is going on in Democrat run cities is enough to know what the whole of America would be like if they won in November. Bill Clinton, Epstien, (the list of dead people associated with the Clintons) its becoming a national movement, never mind black lives matter, sickos lives matter.
|
|
|
Post by Ak9 on Jun 21, 2020 17:36:58 GMT
Sabotage The deliberate destruction of property or obstruction of normal operations, as by civilians or enemy agents in a time of war. n. The deliberate attempt to damage, destroy, or hinder a cause or activity. transitive verb To damage, destroy, or hinder (something) by sabotage www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkSD1JAvWmQ
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2020 14:42:34 GMT
Sounds like a good cause, let's rally the base, except we now know an attached agenda. Everyone can see how chaotic it is with all these riots etc. Certainly Trump is to blame for this, that will be the talking point for the Dems. Liberals say keep the riots going make as much chaos as you can, and would you please get Mr. Gort his Obama phone to shut him up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2020 16:20:07 GMT
From - K.T. McFarland On Election Day 2016 I was in the green room at Fox News in midtown Manhattan waiting to go on the air, as was Ambassador John Bolton.
I asked John if he had already voted, to which he replied, “Yes, for Trump. He’s an idiot, but anybody is better than Hillary Clinton.”
That’s why I had my doubts when Bolton lobbied so aggressively for and became President Trump’s national security adviser less than two years later.
I figured it would be a rocky ride for them both and predicted it wouldn’t end well.
First, they had very different approaches to foreign policy. Trump’s first priority was to rebuild the economy, then use it as leverage to renegotiate trade deals. He would use the bully pulpit to get our security allies to increase their contributions to our mutual defense.
More from Opinion
• Sen. Deb Fischer: Nuclear arms control – US can't play politics. Here's what must happen next
• Daniel Turner: Carbon tax is a bad idea that would hurt our economy and destroy jobs
• Andrew McCarthy: Trump's Supreme Court list – Will 2016 battle plan work this year?
What he would not do was get us bogged down in more forever wars. Trump was an outspoken critic of Bush’s Iraq war, Bolton one of its architects. I once asked Bolton whether his child had considered military service. He looked at me dismissively and said, “No, of course not.” So, it was all right for other people’s children to fight in his forever wars, just not his own.
Bolton and Trump clashed from the beginning – not just over policy, but in style and temperament. Bolton pushed for preemptive military action against Iran, Syria, Venezuela and North Korea. When the president took a different course, Bolton took to the phone. He became the “anonymous source” for reporters, dishing out tales of White House chaos and presidential incompetence.
Bolton was so convinced of his superior intelligence that he was condescending to everyone, including the president. He was increasingly isolated within the West Wing; cabinet officers ignored him and went behind his back directly to the president. He even avoided contact with his own National Security Council staff.
What John Bolton has done is shred executive privilege for future presidents. There will no longer be such a thing as an off-the-record conversation between a president and his advisers.
I heard from several of my former NSC colleagues who remained at the White House after I left that Bolton spent most of his time – when he wasn’t in the Oval Office – sitting in his office behind closed doors. His staff wasn’t sure what he did for those hours on end. Now we know – he was, in all likelihood, turning his copious notes into a manuscript, presumably in anticipation of getting a lucrative book deal, and rushing it into print quickly when the inevitable happened and he was fired.
Bolton’s book has “rocked Washington.” The headlines put out by his PR team are incendiary. But on more careful reading, most of Bolton’s complaints are about what President Trump said in the Oval Office, what he mused about doing when he was letting off steam or fantasizing about settling scores with fake news or the deep state. That’s classic Trump.
President Trump uses those meetings as brainstorming sessions. He is not a passive recipient of information; he immediately takes charge of a briefing and takes it in the direction he wants. He tosses out ideas, the more out-of-the-box the better, and expects others to do the same. These meetings are free-for-alls, with everybody weighing in.
If you argue with President Trump, he may grumble and argue back, but that is what his advisers are for: to lay out the flaws in his arguments and warn him if what he’s proposing is illegal or out of bounds. That is why presidents have “executive privilege,” which is the right to keep discussions with top aides confidential.
What John Bolton has done is shred executive privilege for future presidents. There will no longer be such a thing as an off-the-record conversation between a president and his advisers. Everything, every speculation, every offhand remark will be fair game for the next kiss-and-tell book.
One thing I have learned in working for President Trump is to watch what he does, not necessarily what he says. Professional politicians have smoothed off their rough edges; they measure their words, in public and in private. Donald Trump is no professional politician; he revels in his political incorrectness. He says a lot of things, he tweets a lot of things, he changes his mind, he cajoles one minute and criticizes the next, he rants.
According to Bolton, President Trump wanted to cut off aid to Ukraine unless they investigated Biden’s ties to corruption. But did President Trump do it? No. He threatened to pull out of NATO unless our partners ponied up for their fair share. But did he do it? No.
Some of the most serious accusations Bolton makes are that President Trump tried to enlist Chinese support to help him get reelected. Yet, Bolton himself wasn’t in those meetings, and those who were have since come forward to say Bolton is lying. Furthermore, Bolton’s claims don’t make sense. Trump is the first American president ever to stand up to the Chinese. Why would President Xi Jinping want him to be reelected? Surely his interests lie in a President Joe Biden, who just a few months ago scoffed at the suggestion China posed a threat to our interests.
One cannot help but wonder why John Bolton, who came to believe President Trump was “unfit for office,” refused to come forward during impeachment. He offered some flim-flam excuses, but perhaps his motivation was financial. Testifying publicly before Congress before his book was on sale would have undercut its shock value – and his profits.
No doubt John Bolton will get rich selling his White House story and will become the newest darling of the Trump-hating world. But at what price to the nation? More division, more rancor, more hatred.
Washington has always attracted the venal and the vain, the ambitious and the arrogant, but even they must blanch at what John Bolton has done.
www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-bolton-knew-wouldnt-end-well-kt-mcfarland
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2020 17:21:51 GMT
And if you say something negative about The Borough of Land Management (BLM) you are immediately branded as racist. It's actually a smart way to implement their agenda use BLM as an umbrella cover, which could not be attacked.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2020 11:52:29 GMT
www.foxnews.com/us/residents-near-seattles-chop-ask-what-took-city-so-long-to-breakup-protestResidents who live near Seattle’s "police-free" zone called CHOP –¬ “Capitol Hill Organized Protest" – expressed relief after Mayor Jenny Durkan announced Monday that city officials are working to end the protest, following two shootings over the weekend, one of them deadly.
But despite the mayor’s decision to act, some residents who live by the area were critical of the city's leadership for taking so long to act.
Maybe “residents” will now start to be politically cognizant in their political choices, in other words you vote Democrat what did you expect, I have no sympathy for dumb people. Too bad a death had to serve as enlightenment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2020 12:47:59 GMT
This is heartless to me so much that an individual had to be killed before a sliver of reality sunk in and this Democrat mayor had to eat crow crow crow crow damn she should lick her face with crow feathers about her mouth. This is so sickening and yet so predictable. But the big question remains who are the people that voted her in. And they are all on the same level of dumbness. Or is that dumb ass.. And guilty of murder as she is. As a mayor she should’ve had the “wisdom” to see this coming but as a Democrat she was just plain dumb. Should be charged at least with involuntary manslaughter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2020 15:16:08 GMT
Hey kids, spoken in the voice of Mr. Rogers. Will you be my neighbor? Today we have a math lesson. Can you say math, no not meth, math. Okay let’s begin. Is a death in Minneapolis caused by a police man equal to, and that means the same as, a death in Seattle caused by a Democrat mayor. You’re right absolutely not. It would take at least 10 deaths caused by a Democrat mayor to equal one death caused by a cop. Okay kids go out and play now, no fighting but if you must, only punch the kids that have Republican parents. www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-msnbc-primetime-ignore-seattles-plans-to-dismantle-chop-zone-after-shootings
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Jun 24, 2020 3:59:23 GMT
The following is an interesting read. My Black skating friend of 30 years, Thomas M. tells a different story, but his point is the same as the one depicted below. The Root website seems to present many racist Anti-White articles, but then, as many Blacks insinuate, I'm a Whitey, and I can't see their point because of it. However, the following opinion is still interesting to read...
When 'Uncle Tom' Became a [Black] Insult
Adena Spingarn, 5/17/10 6:19AM Adena Spingarn is a graduate student in English literature at Harvard University.
Today nobody wants to be called an Uncle Tom, but 150 years ago, it was a compliment. In Harriet Beecher Stowe's abolitionist 1852 novel, Uncle Tom's Cabin, Uncle Tom is a martyr, not a sell-out. His devotion to his fellow slaves is so unshakable that he sacrifices a chance for freedom and, ultimately, his life to help them.
How did a term of high praise become the ultimate black-on-black insult? Until recently, scholars believed that "Uncle Tom" was first used as an epithet in 1919 by Rev. George Alexander McGuire, a supporter of the radical black nationalist Marcus Garvey.
Addressing the first convention of the Universal Negro Improvement Association, McGuire declared, "the Uncle Tom nigger has got to go, and his place must be taken by the new leader of the Negro race … not a black man with a white heart, but a black man with a black heart." In the event's opening parade, marchers held protest signs that hopefully proclaimed, "Uncle Tom's dead and buried."
The irony of Uncle Tom's change in meaning was how far whites lagged behind. At the same time that Uncle Tom was becoming an undesirable model for many in the black community, the Daughters of the Confederacy lobbied Southern legislatures to outlaw performances of Uncle Tom's Cabin, because, they insisted, the play slandered the South in its harsh depiction of slavery. The truth about slavery remained a fraught political battleground, in which the Uncle Tom that was too submissive for many blacks seemed, at the same time, deeply dangerous to Southern whites.
Southern whites didn't want Uncle Tom in their towns, but neither, as it turned out, did Northern blacks. During the Great Migration, as Southern migrants began to come to the North in increasingly large numbers, sectional tensions erupted within the race. In 1910, when a black Georgia woman tried to put together a petition for segregated schools in Chicago, the Chicago Defender castigated her as another "southern white folks' lover" who was bringing Southern customs where they weren't welcome: "When we are in touch with Mrs. Johnson, we will show her the back door to Chicago and have her beat it back to her dear old southern home, where all the Uncle Toms and Topsys should be."
The problem with Uncle Tom was not that he existed, but that he was coming North and taking some of the best jobs away from more progressive men. Railroad porter positions, in particular, seemed to be increasingly filled by Uncle Tom types who brought a submissive Southern sensibility with them. "Too much South," concluded the Defender in 1911, adapting the language of white supremacists: "Brand them and send them back to the uncut timber and sage bushes and let them juggle cocoanuts with their brothers."
In this battle between the Old South and the New North, the modern black man was "the NEW Negro, and NOT of the 'Uncle Tom' class, the passing of whom so many white citizens regret," as Spanish War veteran R.P. Roots asserted in a 1915 letter to Secretary of War Lindley M. Garrison.
Perhaps spurred by the death of the accommodationist leader Booker T. Washington in 1915, derogatory uses of Uncle Tom flourished in the subsequent years, especially in the pages of the Defender. Uncle Tom was part of an old racial program, one that had argued for abolition but had not pushed on to demand equal treatment under the law. In 1916, the paper used the term to describe a Dallas educator who supported segregation: "Like Uncle Tom of ‘Cabin' Fame This Man is Ready to Submit to Anything a White Man Tells Him—Men of This Stripe Not Even Fitted to Train Skunks Much Less Children."
Segregation, not slavery, was the new evil now that the slavery days had passed. The time was near, one anonymous letter to the Defender contended, "when the Black man must wipe off his humble submissive ‘Uncle Tom' smile: then, henceforth stand up and demand justice." The Uncle Tom of the slavery past had been too subservient to whites, but the rising generation of New Negroes would more aggressively assert its rights.
When Garvey's black nationalists announced Uncle Tom's death in their parade posters, they certainly spoke too soon. More than 150 years after his birth in Stowe's novel, Uncle Tom is still alive and well in America, popping up everywhere, from politics to sports to rap music. President Obama and RNC Chairman Michael Steele have both been called Uncle Toms, so have Tiger Woods, T-Pain, and Colin Powell—not to mention the usual suspects like Clarence Thomas and Condoleezza Rice. Ultimately, the Uncle Tom figure indicates an intense racial mistrust and a belief that the interests of blacks and of whites in America are deeply different. As long as racial inequalities in this country persist, Uncle Tom is likely to stick around for a long time yet.
Adena Spingarn is a graduate student in English literature at Harvard University.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 9:33:56 GMT
Helter Skelter
|
|
|
Post by ZETAR on Jun 24, 2020 23:33:32 GMT
“The favorite device of the devil, ancient and modern, is to force a human being into a more or less artificial class, accuse the class of unnamed and unnameable sin, and then damn any individual in the alleged class, however innocent he may be.”
-- W. E. B. Du Bois
You can fool some people sometimes But you couldn't fool all the people all the time And now we see the light You stand up for your rights!
SHALOM...Z
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Jun 25, 2020 0:03:36 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2020 0:49:20 GMT
Might as well ask for honesty in congress while we're at it.
|
|
|
Post by Ak9 on Jun 25, 2020 12:22:15 GMT
Dems can't run their own cities. They're turning them into third world. Why would anyone vote for them to run this country ?
|
|
|
Post by ZETAR on Jun 25, 2020 16:14:40 GMT
FBI ARRESTS DEMOCRAT LA COUNCILMAN 'WORST CORRUPTION SCANDAL IN ALMOST A CENTURY'SHALOM...Z
|
|