|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Mar 29, 2019 23:14:02 GMT
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Published on May 11, 2018
~
Crystal
|
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Mar 30, 2019 11:29:28 GMT
Good morning lovely UFOCasebookers,
Crystal
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2019 13:02:57 GMT
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Published on May 11, 2018
~
Crystal
Must be one expensive drone |
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Mar 30, 2019 14:25:35 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2019 1:58:01 GMT
Good News PeopleDisclosure is Just around The Corner.. Our Russian Friends are going To Blow The Lid Off Area 51! God Bless! 
A Russian Tu-154M-ON (NATO reporting name: “Careless”) reconnaissance plane has conducted a surveillance flight over US military facilities located on the west coast of the country, The Drive online magazine reported.
The US threatened to suspend its participation in the treaty in 2018, claiming that Russia was not adhering to it, but the State Department later stated that Washington would not follow through on the threats.
|
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Mar 31, 2019 11:31:27 GMT
Happy Sunday morning lovely people,
Telegram (Worcester, Massachusetts)
Read It and Reap: Book details strange happenings in north central Mass.
31 March 2019
By Ann Connery Frantz / Correspondent
LEOMINSTER — A few weeks ago, Ronny LeBlanc of Leominster sat behind a small table set up near the café at Barnes & Noble in Watertower Plaza. He sat behind a stack of paperbacks, each with the same spooky black cover featuring predatory cat eyes over a black background. Its title, “Monsterland.”
One must stop for that, which resulted in a brief conversation about aliens, orbs and forestland creatures — not far away, but close to home. LeBlanc didn’t seem “out there,” so we talked a bit ... and looking through his book later revealed a well-documented portrait of sightings and police reports through the years, centered on the area around Leominster, Sterling, Lancaster and other towns bordering Leominster State Forest.
His book, published in 2016, shares a lot of lore certain to appeal to UFO buffs and local history fans. Monsterland is a moniker given to the region where most sightings have occurred, but there’s plenty of information about incidents in nearby Gardner (Bigfoot, anyone?) and Devens, where viewers often reported mysterious orange orbs zooming across the sky.
Laugh or not at the idea of “what’s out there,” LeBlanc’s book is a careful history of weird phenomena in or near Leominster State Forest, many reported to police. It’s entertaining, with bits of info one might not otherwise know. For instance, there’s really a Massachusetts Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization and it lists multiple cases of unexplained sightings.
Between 1966 and 1968, dozens of UFO sightings occurred over ponds in north central Massachusetts. Testimony about late 1960s encounters from Leominster’s most famous alleged alien abductee, Betty Andreasson, has stood up to expert investigation for decades.
One can learn more about sasquatch, or Big Foot, encounters here as well. In his research, LeBlanc has interviewed experts elsewhere on similar reports.
The book is a fun read, and when you’re finished, your teenage relatives will love it.
www.telegram.com/entertainmentlife/20190331/read-it-and-reap-book-details-strange-happenings-in-north-central-mass
Crystal
|
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Mar 31, 2019 11:35:24 GMT
Richard Dolan
Streamed live 14 hours ago (30 March 2019)
UFOs are too readily dismissed and forgotten in our history, despite having been central to some of the most dramatic moments in the 20th and 21st centuries. One of them concerned the repeated overflights of unknown craft over the capital of the United States during the summer of 1952, an incredible year of shocking military encounters with these objects.
~
Crystal
|
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Mar 31, 2019 14:15:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Mar 31, 2019 19:35:31 GMT
Now they are saying, if it actually landed, it most likely did so near Perry, Florida.
|
|
|
|
Post by WingsofCrystal on Apr 1, 2019 11:29:19 GMT
Happy April!
Phys.org
MIT and NASA engineers demonstrate a new kind of airplane wing
by David L. Chandler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 April 2019
A new way of fabricating aircraft wings could enable radical new designs
A team of engineers has built and tested a radically new kind of airplane wing, assembled from hundreds of tiny identical pieces. The wing can change shape to control the plane's flight, and could provide a significant boost in aircraft production, flight, and maintenance efficiency, the researchers say.
The new approach to wing construction could afford greater flexibility in the design and manufacturing of future aircraft. The new wing design was tested in a NASA wind tunnel and is described today in a paper in the journal Smart Materials and Structures, co-authored by research engineer Nicholas Cramer at NASA Ames in California; MIT alumnus Kenneth Cheung SM '07 Ph.D. '12, now at NASA Ames; Benjamin Jenett, a graduate student in MIT's Center for Bits and Atoms; and eight others.
Instead of requiring separate movable surfaces such as ailerons to control the roll and pitch of the plane, as conventional wings do, the new assembly system makes it possible to deform the whole wing, or parts of it, by incorporating a mix of stiff and flexible components in its structure. The tiny subassemblies, which are bolted together to form an open, lightweight lattice framework, are then covered with a thin layer of similar polymer material as the framework.
The result is a wing that is much lighter, and thus much more energy efficient, than those with conventional designs, whether made from metal or composites, the researchers say. Because the structure, comprising thousands of tiny triangles of matchstick-like struts, is composed mostly of empty space, it forms a mechanical "metamaterial" that combines the structural stiffness of a rubber-like polymer and the extreme lightness and low density of an aerogel.
Jenett explains that for each of the phases of a flight—takeoff and landing, cruising, maneuvering and so on—each has its own, different set of optimal wing parameters, so a conventional wing is necessarily a compromise that is not optimized for any of these, and therefore sacrifices efficiency. A wing that is constantly deformable could provide a much better approximation of the best configuration for each stage.
more after the jump:
phys.org/news/2019-04-mit-nasa-kind-airplane-wing.html
Crystal
|
|
|
|
Post by ZETAR on Apr 1, 2019 17:13:08 GMT
Gang Stole BILLIONS from UK Taxpayers, Infiltrated Govt, Funded al-Qaeda and Labour
A vast network of British Asian gang members linked to Abu Hamza and the 7/7 bombers infiltrated government agencies, defrauded taxpayers of billions of pounds, and funnelled tens of millions to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda over 20 years, an investigation claims to have found.
The report suggests that, through a complex series of tactics, including exploitation of illegal immigration, benefits fraud, VAT fraud, and mortgage fraud, the gang managed to steal an astonishing £8 billion.
These funds were allegedly used to provide lavish lifestyles for the gang’s members, including luxury cars and properties — but also helped bankroll Osama bin Laden’s notorious al-Qaeda network, claims a Sunday Times investigation.
MORE HERE: www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/04/01/report-gang-stole-billions-infiltrated-govt-funded-al-qaeda-labour/
SHALOM...Z
|
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Apr 1, 2019 18:07:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ZETAR on Apr 1, 2019 19:20:48 GMT
Le premier coup américainThe first “coup” in U.S. history in which government bureaucrats sought to overturn an election and to remove a sitting U.S. president has failed, a columnist noted.
“Not thugs in sunglasses and epaulettes, not oligarchs in private jets, not shaggy would-be Marxists, but sanctimonious arrogant bureaucrats in suits and ties used their government agencies to seek to overturn the 2016 election, abort a presidency, and subvert the U.S. Constitution,” Victor Davis Hanson wrote on Feb. 17 in an op-ed titled ‘Autopsy of a Dead Coup’ for the Center for American Greatness.
“And they did all that and more on the premise that they were our moral superiors and had uniquely divine rights to destroy a presidency that they loathed,” Hanson wrote.
The effort by the Hillary Clinton campaign “to create, disseminate among court media, and then salt among high Obama administration officials, a fabricated, opposition smear dossier failed,” Hanson noted.
www.worldtribune.com/shame-victor-davis-hanson-delivers-scathing-indictment-of-failed-coup/?fbclid=IwAR2a8Y_ZUJePTnRjy9RC0ZuRnIZbmV_zAC6ZibjDnQxcHlvNrFyrr0_SR9g
“So has the second special prosecutor phase of the coup to abort the Trump presidency failed. There are many elements to what in time likely will become recognized as the greatest scandal in American political history.”
Hanson continued: “The deep state is by nature cowardly. It does not move unless it feels it can disguise its subterranean efforts or that, if revealed, those efforts will be seen as popular and necessary – as expressed in tell-all book titles such as fired FBI Directors James Comey’s Higher Loyalty or in disgraced Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s psychodramatic The Threat.
“In candidate and President Trump’s case that prepping of the battlefield translated into a coordinated effort among the media, political progressives and celebrities to so demonize Trump that his imminent removal likely would appear a relief to the people. Anything was justified that led to that end.”
Hanson noted that “Journalists themselves consulted with the Clinton campaign to coordinate attacks. From the WikiLeaks trove, journalistic grandees such as John Harwood, Mark Leibovich, Dana Milbank, and Glenn Thrush often communicated (and even post factum were unapologetic about doing so) with John Podesta’s staff to construct various anti-Trump themes and have the Clinton campaign review or even audit them in advance.
“Some contract ‘journalists’ apparently were paid directly by Fusion GPS – created by former reporters Glen Simpson of the Wall Street Journal and Susan Schmidt of the Washington Post – to spread lurid stories from the dossier. Others more refined like Christiane Amanpour and James Rutenberg had argued for a new journalistic ethos that partisan coverage was certainly justified in the age of Trump, given his assumed existential threat to The Truth.”
Or as Rutenberg put it in 2016: “If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, non-opinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable. But the question that everyone is grappling with is: Do normal standards apply? And if they don’t, what should take their place?”
Hanson wrote: “I suppose Rutenberg never considered that half the country might have considered the Hillary Clinton presidency ‘potentially dangerous,’ and yet did not expect the evening news, in 90 percent of its coverage, to reflect such suspicions.”
CNN “soon proved that it is no longer a news organization at all – as reporters like Gloria Borger, Chris Cuomo, Eric Lichtblau, Manu Raju, Brian Rokus, Jake Tapper, Jeff Zeleny, and teams such as Jim Sciutto, Carl Bernstein, and Marshall Cohen as well as Thomas Frank, and Lex Harris all trafficked in false rumors and unproven gossip detrimental to Trump, while hosts and guest hosts such as Reza Aslan, the late Anthony Bourdain, and Anderson Cooper stooped to obscenity and grossness to attack Trump,” Hanson wrote.
“Both politicos and celebrities tried to drive Trump’s numbers down to facilitate some sort of popular ratification for his removal. Hollywood and the coastal corridor punditry exhausted public expressions of assassinating or injuring the president, as the likes of Jim Carrey, Johnny Depp, Robert de Niro, Peter Fonda, Kathy Griffin, Madonna, Snoop Dogg, and a host of others vied rhetorically to slice apart, shoot, beat up, cage, behead, and blow up the president.
“Left wing social media and mainstream journalism spread sensational lies about supposed maniacal Trump supporters in MAGA hats. They constructed fantasies that veritable white racists were now liberated to run amuck insulting and beating up people of color as they taunted the poor and victimized minorities with vicious Trump sloganeering – even as the Covington farce and now the even more embarrassing Jussie Smollett charade evaporated without apologies from the media and progressive merchants of such hate.”
SHALOM...Z
EDIT TO ADD:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2019 23:51:00 GMT
Happy April!
Phys.org
MIT and NASA engineers demonstrate a new kind of airplane wing
by David L. Chandler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 April 2019
A new way of fabricating aircraft wings could enable radical new designs
A team of engineers has built and tested a radically new kind of airplane wing, assembled from hundreds of tiny identical pieces. The wing can change shape to control the plane's flight, and could provide a significant boost in aircraft production, flight, and maintenance efficiency, the researchers say.
The new approach to wing construction could afford greater flexibility in the design and manufacturing of future aircraft. The new wing design was tested in a NASA wind tunnel and is described today in a paper in the journal Smart Materials and Structures, co-authored by research engineer Nicholas Cramer at NASA Ames in California; MIT alumnus Kenneth Cheung SM '07 Ph.D. '12, now at NASA Ames; Benjamin Jenett, a graduate student in MIT's Center for Bits and Atoms; and eight others.
Instead of requiring separate movable surfaces such as ailerons to control the roll and pitch of the plane, as conventional wings do, the new assembly system makes it possible to deform the whole wing, or parts of it, by incorporating a mix of stiff and flexible components in its structure. The tiny subassemblies, which are bolted together to form an open, lightweight lattice framework, are then covered with a thin layer of similar polymer material as the framework.
The result is a wing that is much lighter, and thus much more energy efficient, than those with conventional designs, whether made from metal or composites, the researchers say. Because the structure, comprising thousands of tiny triangles of matchstick-like struts, is composed mostly of empty space, it forms a mechanical "metamaterial" that combines the structural stiffness of a rubber-like polymer and the extreme lightness and low density of an aerogel.
Jenett explains that for each of the phases of a flight—takeoff and landing, cruising, maneuvering and so on—each has its own, different set of optimal wing parameters, so a conventional wing is necessarily a compromise that is not optimized for any of these, and therefore sacrifices efficiency. A wing that is constantly deformable could provide a much better approximation of the best configuration for each stage.
more after the jump:
phys.org/news/2019-04-mit-nasa-kind-airplane-wing.html
Crystal
It was so slow it almost hanged in the sky. It also seemed to change its shape slightly as it turned.
Thanx Crystal...I guess ole Doc Michael never really debunked those thingys...sigh..I noticed he was kinda losing that brilliant sharp razor-like edge ..it was incremental..with the passage of time that is.. Tommy would ask me..Sys..is there something odd with Doc. do you think he's losing it? Even Zetar became concerned. Being we didn't want to panic the rest ..we kept it under wraps. Then one day..poof..gone.  Maybe the PTB got to him. I recall even Lev commenting..you get the point..he said point..like the point of an ice pick or sumtin'. Anywho...But his work with the Doritos was stellar..maybe with those later persistent reports..we need a fresh bag of Doritos to look at, rethink, and decide. 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2019 4:34:50 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6874927/Is-human-colonies-look-like-Mars-NASA-announces-finalists-habitat-competition.html  NASA has announced three finalists in an ongoing design competition tasking engineers to dream up sustainable dwellings that can be 3-D printed on Mars. Finalists split a prize pot of $100,000 and include SEArch+/Apis Cor, out of New York who took first place, Zopherus from Rogers, Arkansas who came in second, and Mars Incubator out of New Have Connecticut who took the third spot. The three contestants were chosen out of a pool of 11 candidates and were scored based on 'architectural layout, programming, efficient use of interior space, and the 3D-printing scalability and constructability of the habitat.' From here, according to NASA, teams will go on to compete in a showdown with a prize pool of $800,000 -- the final competition phase slated to take place in early May. The remaining teams represent the final contestants out of a competition started in 2015 through NASA's Centennial Challenge -- a program that engages the public to come up with innovative solutions. 
|
|
Maybe the PTB got to him. I recall even Lev commenting..you get the point..he said point..like the point of an ice pick or sumtin'. Anywho...But his work with the Doritos was stellar..maybe with those later persistent reports..we need a fresh bag of Doritos to look at, rethink, and decide. 
