|
Post by gus on Dec 25, 2020 23:34:46 GMT
Just chewing on this a bit more Trump was told by ETs not to disclose. Therefore they would of asked TTSA to stop what they are doing?
Connecting the dots...... who really knows 🤷‍♂️
|
|
|
Post by skizicks on Dec 26, 2020 1:27:14 GMT
This conversation seems like we've had it before.
|
|
|
Post by gus on Dec 26, 2020 3:28:55 GMT
This conversation seems like we've had it before. 🤷‍♂️
|
|
|
Post by gus on Dec 29, 2020 4:44:41 GMT
The omnibus bill has been signed into law today, to which the SSCI’s UAP mandate is now attached. The 6-month clock has now started ticking!!!
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Dec 30, 2020 14:51:01 GMT
Coronavirus bill started 180-day countdown for UFO disclosures The provision was attached a committee comment
By Steven Greenstreet, Steven Nelson | New York Post, Dec. 30, 2020
President Trump’s signature Sunday on the $2.3 trillion COVID-19 relief and government funding bill started a 180-day countdown for the Pentagon and spy agencies to say what they know about UFOs.
The provision received very little attention in part because it wasn’t included in the text of the 5,593-page legislation, but as a "committee comment" attached to the annual intelligence authorization act, which was rolled into the massive bill.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said in the comment it "directs the [director of national intelligence], in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of such other agencies… to submit a report within 180 days of the date of enactment of the Act, to the congressional intelligence and armed services committees on unidentified aerial phenomena."
The report must address "observed airborne objects that have not been identified" and should include a "detailed analysis of unidentified phenomena data collected by: a. geospatial intelligence; b. signals intelligence; c. human intelligence; and d. measurement and signals intelligence," the committee said.
The report must also contain " detailed analysis of data of the FBI, which was derived from investigations of intrusions of unidentified aerial phenomena data over restricted United States airspace … and an assessment of whether this unidentified aerial phenomena activity may be attributed to one or more foreign adversaries."
www.foxnews.com/politics/covid-19-bill-180-day-countdown-ufo-disclosures
|
|
|
Post by bonehead on Dec 30, 2020 16:59:26 GMT
A rider for disclosure? Yeah, I will believe that when I see it. I am not holding my breath....
Bonehead
|
|
|
Post by HAL on Dec 30, 2020 22:31:08 GMT
No one with two connected brain cells will tell blabber mouth Trump anything.
Anyway, he will be history in twenty two days.
And the two words 'National Security' will take care of the rest.
|
|
|
Post by gus on Dec 31, 2020 11:04:10 GMT
News in Dr Greer is screaming it’s a False Flag. When release of UAP report in 180 days, supported by the TTSA.
🤷‍♂️
|
|
|
Post by HAL on Dec 31, 2020 18:25:40 GMT
Seems Trump is intent on stirring up more trouble with China. He had better have proof.
|
|
|
Post by erno86 on Dec 31, 2020 19:43:29 GMT
Dec. 29, 2020 - "While this news may be exciting for many UFO/UAP enthusiasts, the UAP report provision is not binding law, so there is no guarantee the public will be provided any comprehensive information on UAP. Additionally, if the UAP task force deems certain information classified, the legislative branch does not have the authority to declassify that information in order to make it publicly available." source: The Debrief article - "UAP Task Force To Provide Report To Senate Intelligence Committee" - Dec. 29, 2020 www.thedebrief.org/uap-task-force-set-in-motion-with-passage-of-intelligence-authorization-act/
|
|
|
Post by gus on Dec 31, 2020 21:48:16 GMT
Dec. 29, 2020 - "While this news may be exciting for many UFO/UAP enthusiasts, the UAP report provision is not binding law, so there is no guarantee the public will be provided any comprehensive information on UAP. Additionally, if the UAP task force deems certain information classified, the legislative branch does not have the authority to declassify that information in order to make it publicly available." Â source: The Debrief article - "UAP Task Force To Provide Report To Senate Intelligence Committee" - Dec. 29, 2020 www.thedebrief.org/uap-task-force-set-in-motion-with-passage-of-intelligence-authorization-act/Yes I was wondering if that was the case.
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Jan 1, 2021 19:18:27 GMT
DeVoid
It could always get worse, but … By Billy Cox Thursday, Dec 31, 2020 8:10 PM
In March, a Washington-based news site that focuses on Asian affairs speculated about what might happen if China became the first country to receive and identify intelligent radio signals from out yonder. “It is China, not the United States, that is in the pole position to detect a signal from extraterrestrial intelligence,” noted The Diplomat. Already, China’s Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) has detected “bursts of extremely powerful radio-waves from deep space of varying duration whose origins remain a mystery.”
This came well before the ignominious collapse of the National Science Foundation’s massive radiotelescope in Arecibo on December 1. With its 1,000 foot spherical reflector, Arecibo Observatory premiered in 1963 as the world’s largest dish. Once pitched as Uncle Sam’s best hope for interacting with alien civilizations, its Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence rated tax dollars and was idealized as Carl Sagan’s big-screen fantasy. To see it in ruins today seems an apt metaphor for those tunnel-vision aspirations, which consigned the UFO mystery to the science ghetto.
Researching the possibilities of alien radiowaves and UFOs was never a mutually exclusive endeavor. Yet, for reasons that are becoming increasingly obvious, some of SETI’s greatest champions, like Seth Shostak, felt compelled to make it a binary proposition. In his 2009 book Alien Hunter, Shostak even suggested that SETI proponents were victims of “class warfare” – real scientists vs. the hoi polloi – and that if the former scored first, “UFOs would have a hard time staying in the limelight.”
Yeah, well. Anyway …
With a $100M assist from Russian jillionaire Yuri Milner, SETI research rolls on, from other hardware, in other countries, including the U.S. But in reminding readers that China’s FAST passed Arecibo in the size-matters derby when it went online in 2016, The Diplomat raised a question that, lately, needn’t be confined to radiowaves.
“How would the United States and other allied powers react to the fact that the greatest discovery in human history was made possible through the efforts of an authoritarian, repressive regime?” it wondered. “Would this mark an intensification of the rivalry between China and the West, or lead to its decline?”
In January, De Void grabbed a few minutes with retired Admiral Gary Roughead between lectures here in Sarasota. He was the U.S. Chief of Naval Operations from 2007-2011. His presentation focused on China’s strategic ambitions, which would require controlling sea lanes and narrow choke points between land masses. He said the nation that develops underwater assets that can perform with the ease of aerial vehicles will command “the future of warfare.”
Responding to a UFO question, Roughead preferred to employ the more drone-skewed acronym UAA (unmanned autonomous aircraft). But an elliptical remark he made nearly a year ago appears to have deeper context today.
“I think we’re going to continue to see new technology in the form of unmanned systems that will begin to interfere with military capability,” he said in January. “And we’re not alone. There’s no question that China and Russia want to plan. Without knowing what they may be – are they phenomena or are they vehicles that someone was able to get into place? – I think one of the great challenges that more people looked at was, where would these have come from?”
Tim McMillan’s recent piece on the Pentagon’s just-acknowledged Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force cites unnamed sources who indicate its analysts have become increasingly focused on unidentified submersible objects (USO), also known as fast movers. A photo of an apparent USO climbing out of the water and executing a near-miss with a military jet in 2019 is allegedly making the rounds in classified circles. Who knows, maybe someday we’ll get to see it ourselves.
But instead of launching a budget-swamping, Apollo-scale race against China to figure it out first, a challenge of this magnitude should create a more creative opening, Roughead said.
“We have to look for opportunities, we have to look for venues where we can bring caring people together to say, OK, there’s a technological issue here, how do we bring the bright minds together? How do we protect our legitimate national security technologies and intellectual property, but still get after some hard problems? I think that’s a way for closing some gaps down the road and bringing trust between the two.”
Which brings us to 2021, and what may lie ahead for Lue Elizondo, Chris Mellon and Steve Justice. All recently left Tom DeLonge’s To The Stars Academy for other as-yet-unannounced projects.
“We’re not entertainers. Our talents lie in engaging governments, Congress and in international organizations, and we’re ready to shift into second gear,” Elizondo told De Void in a recent interview. “Entertainment is one way to do it, but it’s not comprehensive.”
What does second gear look like? With Clinton White House rainmaker, Obama adviser, and outspoken advocate for UFO transparency John Podesta leading the Biden transition team, the grapevine is abuzz. Elizondo, who ran DoD’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (the UAPTF predecessor), declines to comment on conversations he may or may not have had with people he may or may not have met. He does, however, echo Roughead’s angle.
“What I will say is, we want to take the conversation international, to get this before an international body,” says Elizondo, between touching bases with sources in Washington, D.C. “I think we have to (cooperate). I don’t think we have a choice. I won’t say which ones we’re looking at, but at the end of the day, we recognize this as a global phenomenon.”
The strategic stakes are unprecedented. Which begs the question: Can a single nation literally afford to tackle a potential global security risk in a vacuum?
“Let’s look at a real-world situation, like world hunger or clean drinking water,” Elizondo says. “The amount of money the U.S. spends in trying to bring clean drinking water to the world or a particular country is absolutely paltry compared with the money we spend on a single aircraft carrier in one year, right? A weapon system.
“The Department of Defense does not involve itself in humanitarian relief, so to speak – it may support another agency like the State Department but that’s not its main function. Its main function is to fight and win wars, decisively. I understand people’s initial objection to the fact that there’s a threat narrative. But this is the nature of the beast — if you want to pursue something on this level, it has to relate in some way, shape or form to the nation’s security.”
Elizondo contends there are better ways. He points to rival nations’ cooperative treaties on Antarctica as a model.
“Other countries have the same type of (UFO research) efforts we have, and probably they have some understandings we don’t,” he says. “So we should get on board sooner than later, put our differences aside, and start working together. Ultimately they’re all going to do whatever’s in their best interests, and we’re not gonna stop Russia or China or anybody else from looking into this topic and spending money on it. We don’t want to isolate ourselves from the conversation, or we could run the risk of finding ourselves being left behind in the dark ages.”
So here we are. A wretched, miserable waste of a year that made a mockery of perfect vision comes to an end. And yet, as the sun sets on the last of it, amid its final light and the rubble of old paradigms, here’s a toast to the slight possibility, that maybe – with a just little bit of imagination and an acknowledgement of mutual vulnerabilities – 2021 could be the beginning something far more novel than a coronavirus.
devoid.blogs.heraldtribune.com/author/cox/
|
|
|
Post by gus on Jan 2, 2021 0:02:56 GMT
Oh that makes even more sense that the trio go back under Podesta. Those 3 are now what’s termed in Australia as in “Decision making groups”.
They are no longer in opposition or in an activist role. They now inside government itself as advisors who can now influence decision making. That then goes down to the departments like Pentagon, NSA and DoJ.
They are no longer the foot soldiers of the bureaucratic machine.
|
|
|
Post by bonehead on Jan 2, 2021 0:55:00 GMT
I think Devoid's article gets right to the very heart of why the UFO dudes keep us all at arm's length. Any "aid" they may give us is more likely to be used for belligerent intentions than for the good of humanity. We are a mentally ill race. Until we clean up our act and start acting like human beings that actually care about all other human beings, we are persona non grata. We, literally, are not worthy....
And after the political farce of the last few years, it seems that as a culture, we have only been heading deeper down the hole of maladaptiive idiocy.
That's my take. And apparently it is Billy Cox's as well.
Bonehead
|
|
|
Post by gus on Jan 2, 2021 11:28:21 GMT
|
|