Well I’m really looking forward to see Biden accuse Trump of all the various misdeeds and innuendo Biden has been spouting unchallenged. Trump will now have the opportunity to respond to Biden and his unsubstantiated talking points. This debate should be an eye opener for all of those misinformed individuals who only watch CNN and MSNBC. Finally the two of them on stage together. I just wonder how brave and bold Biden will be when he doesn’t have a prompter in front of him. Trump is going to tear him a new one, this is going to be a slaughter. I have more excitement about this then watching any Super Bowl football game.
The Chairman of the Presidential Debate Commission is Co-Founder of “Color Revolution” Org Linked to Steele Dossier and...
From the failed Chris Wallace-Biden tag-team attempt against Trump, to biased moderator Susan Page’s shrill interruptions of Vice President Pence, to the Presidential Debate Commission’s ridiculous and politically motivated effort to force a “virtual debate” on Biden’s behalf, patriotic Americans have caught on to the fact that there is something deeply unfair about the presidential debates.
This clear bias has justifiably led many observers to wonder what is wrong with the Presidential Debate Commission. Just yesterday, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany called out the Commission directly:
"The Commission on Presidential Debates is little more than a Commission to Re-elect @joebiden!"
Kayleigh’s characterization of the Commission is of course correct. However, its corruption and bias goes beyond the simple fact that it’s in the tank for Joe Biden. The nominally Republican Chairman of Presidential Debate Commission, Frank Fahrenkopf, is both a co-founder and current board member of the International Republican Institute (IRI), a top “Color Revolution” propaganda outfit. The IRI was run by Never Trump neoconservative John McCain for decades. It is closely linked to the thoroughly discredited Steele Dossier at the center of the Russia Hoax.
According to this report, as documented in all socialist-inspired civil wars and revolutions throughout history, the masses of ordinary people have no idea what is being fought over—and is the same in America today, where its peoples haven’t the slightest clue as to what is actually happening—but for those willing to understand, should see them first knowing the current meaning of what world renowned American writer Kurt Vonnegut meant when he said: “I don't know what it is about Hoosiers, but wherever you go there is always a hoosier doing something very important”—a term that refers to a person from the State of Indiana, known as The Hoosier State—that was lived in by President Abraham Lincoln, and is the current residence of Judge Amy Coney Barrett—and most important to know about, saw Lincoln being the cause of their first Civil War, while Barrett is the cause of the second Civil War about to occur.
Like President Lincoln before her, this report explains, Judge Barrett is feared and despised by the socialist Democrat Party—so feared, in fact, yesterday radical leftist news outlet CNN didn’t even allow their viewers to see the first day of her confirmation hearing, which led to it being observed: “Why, it’s almost like CNN wants to control the narrative and show absolutely nothing that could give voters an honest assessment of Barrett”—though if allowed to watch, all these viewers would have seen were socialist Democrats making a mockery of this confirmation hearing not even challenging Judge Barrett’s record—but in the midst of this socialist Democratic confirmation hearing mockery, saw top Republican Party leader US Senator John Kennedy directly driving to the point of what this conflict is really about—the administrative state—which simply means the practice of the US Congress giving its power to unelected federal bureaucrats and judges, who make laws and rulings based on political ideology—and that Judge Barrett, along with the majority of Supreme Court, intends to destroy—a destruction of the administrative state so feared by socialist Democrats they’re willing to destroy their entire nation to prevent it from happening—and in reality is an administrative state that caused their nation’s first civil war—a civil war actually started by an administrative state controlled Supreme Court, whose majority of pro-slavery ideological justices threw the United States Constitution aside when making their Dred Scott v. Sandford ruling denying black people American citizenship—a ruling that ignited a civil war that killed 750,000, more than 20% of the American population—massive death and horror that didn’t need to happen if the Judge Barrett of that time had been listened to and heeded—who was Benjamin Robbins Curtis, the only Supreme Court Justice in history to have resigned from the court over a matter of principle—and in his searing dissent of the disgraceful Dred Scott ruling, wrote words that are as critical to understand today as they were back then:
To allow this to be done with the Constitution, upon reasons purely political, renders its judicial interpretation impossible -- because judicial tribunals, as such, cannot decide upon political considerations.
Political reasons have not the requisite certainty to afford rules of juridical interpretation.
They are different in different men.
They are different in the same men at different times.
And when a strict interpretation of the Constitution, according to the fixed rules which govern the interpretation of laws, is abandoned, and the theoretical opinions of individuals are allowed to control its meaning, we have no longer a Constitution; we are under the government of individual men, who for the time being have power to declare what the Constitution is, according to their own views of what it ought to mean.
Suddenly..the haze just lifted..everything became crystal clear