|
|
Post by SysConfig on Jan 1, 2020 23:07:07 GMT
Excuse..My poor manners Pluto...welcome...you felt very familiar. on the young lad Deep ..I agree with your observations and findings..He majored in Industrial Engineering in Toronto.. but no evidence of a degree..I believe he uber maximized credentials as self promotion marketing vehicle. including BitCoin?ethereum blockchain technology, etc. Hope he finds his niche and happiness someday..
I think this part nips the entire quantum thing in the bud Accepted into the world's first Quantum Computing incubator held at Rotman's Creative Destruction Labs. Successfully completed a 2-month bootcamp covering the fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Information and Quantum Computing. Taught by the world's foremost experts on these topics. Also provided intensive training by Quantum hardware providers D-Wave, Rigetti and Xanadu on how to use their systems. I continue to study all relevant subjects with the help of mentors and open-source...
also provided training is misleading..he was trained or exposed to ..he was not an instructor...
That said one doesn't need a degree to experience ufos or be good person..or specially chosen..its in this case personal anecdotal..prone to embellishments down the road w/o the need to prop up personal skills not there to further prop up credibility as here. |
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Jan 2, 2020 23:50:39 GMT
Plutronus, .. There are OTHER more effective and powerful topologies that are used to synthsize AI that does not utilize stored instruction computational architecture and as such are extremely fast and exhibit super analytical and organic like behaviors. These other types are generally classified, as evidenced by how little is disclosed in the engineering industry literature. Almost nothing appears in print.So how do you know it exists ? Also, From first post. ... and saw 3 entities that had no-chill... What is that supposed to mean ? HAL.
HAL.
Good question. And it exemplifies one of my pet peeves regarding yakkers who claim to have had access to SECRET information, but who are on a stage yakking about the subject or having written a book detailing the SECRET knowledge! In my experience, people who hold or have held SECRET clearances and who talk, are visited by men in suites, generally the FBI, and then, later, the yakker is seen wearing an orange federal jump-suit sitting on a wood chair in the middle of a large cage in an empty warehouse surrounded by guards!! That was the scene content of a photo posted in a hallway of my last employer, to remind us of what happens should we talk. That is the reality of authentic unapproved SECRET information disclosure, anything else is bull-sh.it.
However, while I have had some development experience with so-called 'AI' in a quasi-secret development environment, the process and-or room was not actually classified, although, my partner & I were escorted everywhere by guards, even in the toilet. In today's DoD clime, anything related to that project would absolutely be ITAR restricted. The facility where we worked, is depicted as being an empty lot via Google Earth. Not a military base, yet there was a manned Abrams M1 Tank 
sitting out front, with the engine running 24/7, and two Apache Tactical Attack Helis flying circuit protection around the facility perimeter.
So how did I learn that the other forms of synthetic consciousness are classified and in such a manner that I am able to speak freely about it?
If you are really interested, I'll detail how I know, however, the terse answer, --my information was gleaned over an extended period of time as well as my having a specific interest in similar subjects and as such, I've alway's been on the alert for any information that might be related to that subject. My deduction is the conclusion of a trail of peices of information 'glued' together with some rather compelling events that has led me to state, re; the subject's classification, with supreme confidence of the validity of my statement.
Re; the 'chill' matter, I can only speculate as I did not write it. You would need to ask SysConfig for clarification.
plutronus
|
|
|
|
Post by SysConfig on Jan 3, 2020 4:36:47 GMT
I'm afraid I didn't author that had no chill..Our aspiring quantum physicist did..but I'll take a stab at what he meant..
What does "____ has no chill" mean? : OutOfTheLoop www.reddit.com/.../what_does_has_no_chill_meanIn this phrase, chill is meant the same as it is in the admonition "chill out" - meaning calm, cool-headed, rational. So "X has no chill" means that person X is not, or cannot be cool, calm and rational. In other words they are going crazy or acting very uncool, irrational etc. |
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Jan 3, 2020 5:33:15 GMT
Excuse..My poor manners Pluto...welcome...you felt very familiar. on the young lad Deep ..I agree with your observations and findings..He majored in Industrial Engineering in Toronto.. but no evidence of a degree..I believe he uber maximized credentials as self promotion marketing vehicle. including BitCoin?ethereum blockchain technology, etc. Hope he finds his niche and happiness someday..
I think this part nips the entire quantum thing in the bud Accepted into the world's first Quantum Computing incubator held at Rotman's Creative Destruction Labs. Successfully completed a 2-month bootcamp covering the fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Information and Quantum Computing. Taught by the world's foremost experts on these topics. Also provided intensive training by Quantum hardware providers D-Wave, Rigetti and Xanadu on how to use their systems. I continue to study all relevant subjects with the help of mentors and open-source...
also provided training is misleading..he was trained or exposed to ..he was not an instructor...
That said one doesn't need a degree to experience ufos or be good person..or specially chosen..its in this case personal anecdotal..prone to embellishments down the road w/o the need to prop up personal skills not there to further prop up credibility as here.
SysConfig,
No apology necessary, thanks. Psi intuitives know each other.
I quite agree.
True.
I've done quite a bit of thinking re; this point durring the past 15 years. Why are some people chosen for CE-V contacts? What is unique to Deep Prasad that caused him to contacted?
As for the paralysis/tingling aspect of the contact, that seems to be an alien standard contact protocol that they impose. I suspect that the paralysis serves multiple purposes.
Yep, that's the problem with virtually all alien contacts, as is almost always simply subjective, as there are no other 'evidence' that a contact has actually occurred beyond the experiencer's claim. Once in awhile somebody, likely, completely acidentally is able to snap a blurry photo of their mecha? And so all of these reports are at best anecdotal.
It is interesting to watch how the stories change with time. Sometimes I feel it is accidental, as parts of the original event story was actually not fully realized or was initially poorly described, thereby causing the latter refined story to appear to be embellished. And then, there are the authentic embellishments. I am a frequent InterNet streaming talk show guest, and occasionally invited to give lectures at UFO conferences, as well as a speaker at various MUFON groups. One of the things I have noticed over the years, are the lecturer's information becomes uninterestingly stale after a few shows/conferences. I suspect that is one of the motivating reasons some folk's stories change, so that they can remain interesting in the public's mind. I limit myself to one or two conferences per year so that my story remains fresh. Although I suspect, much as Dr. Harley Rutledge once told me, "I've been told that my information isn't very interesting as its too technical!!", and I suspect that I may well be in that category too!
Harley shared some really interesting ET behavior information...unlike virtually all of the book authors out there, he did his own studies...he worked for it.
Heh, I feel a bit sorry for folks like Deep Prasad, and others too, as UFOology is a cynical crowd. It seems that few in the general public are interested in folk's ET contact stories unless the experiencers are an 'expert' in something or other.
So some 'cook', and 'enhance' their resume, fluffing it up, to make themselves more acceptable, and in theory credible, although sketics often retort that being a long term commercial or military pilot does not in any manner make those persons more qualified observers of strange objects flying about in the sky with them, often a few meters in front of their aircraft, etc!
Seems everytime one re-writes their work resumes when between jobs, that many do the same thing, more or less to 'custom-fit' their work experience to match some desired work.
However, in Deep Prasad's defense, there are many smart non-degreed people who are interested in ET presence studies that are doing useful things. Some of the best science in the world has been produced by non-academics. I really don't intend to appear to demean Deep Prasad, rather, my point is that if one is going to state that they are experts in AI, and that they intend to further ET presence science by employing AI analysis strategies, and then tell lots of folks that is their goal, then they should at least also demonstrate in some manner that they have some modicum of qualification to do so. There are lots of yakkers out there doing our community harm.
We, or rather I, really don't know the full Prasad story, perhaps his skill set sucessfully incites others to do things that he can recognize but is unable to do so himself? Isn't that the definition of most managers?
Time will tell all.
Thanks for the interesting replies.
plutronus
|
|
