|
D-Day
Jul 6, 2023 10:23:45 GMT
Post by cotes777 on Jul 6, 2023 10:23:45 GMT
I can't help but to be reminded of William Cooper's warning years ago about how if the American people came too close to the truth then the gov would green light the alien agenda story. Unfortunately, this is about a world government, and not actual ufo disclosure.
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 6, 2023 16:30:40 GMT
Post by purr on Jul 6, 2023 16:30:40 GMT
I can't help but to be reminded of William Cooper's warning years ago about how if the American people came too close to the truth then the gov would green light the alien agenda story. Unfortunately, this is about a world government, and not actual ufo disclosure. Hi Cotes777, I too often think back to Cooper, awful how he was dismissed as someone confabulating his account, even labeled a psychopath, while seen in the light of the present he TRIED being a whistleblower at a moment in American history when this made him an Enemy of the State, with no friends, nowhere to run and no rights. Courageous guy who chose the hardest road. That said. What do you think the Truth is? And what to your mind would amount to actual UFO disclosure? purr
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 7, 2023 2:06:12 GMT
purr likes this
Post by cotes777 on Jul 7, 2023 2:06:12 GMT
Hi purr - What do I think the truth is? I'm not certain. I have personally seen "ufos" on many different occasions throughout my life. I have not seen an alien, nor any life-form connected to any ufo I have seen. The possibilities are many. The three main views would be; 1. They are us from the future; 2. They are either from another planet OR a highly advanced species who have allowed AI to space travel/explore [either way, physical entities from one place to another in the physical universe]; and 3. Inter-Dimensional entities. Some of the characteristics in reports of ETs are similar to those of demons or fallen angels. If they are inter-dimensional entities, then I would steer towards them being fallen angels possibly. If they are from another world then I would not consider them demons or fallen angels. Perhaps those in the ancient times were just in awe of the technology they possessed and considered them gods, but they were not. UFO Disclosure? Good question! So far, I have seen them act like children in the media... treating us like children in the process. It began with the Pentagon videos of footage from the 2000's. Everyone was behaving as if this is the first footage ever collected by the military. At the same time reviving stories of the Roswell incident of 1947. That is double-think. I think REAL disclosure is Congress hold a public hearing and have all the people who have come out over the years to testify about what they know. Collect that information and piece it together. Have a public statement over the findings in a month or so after the initial hearing. The findings are not the conclusion, but the start. The findings will be what directs the Congress, Senate, and Executive, and even the Supreme Court if need, to bringing to light the truth over certain aspects of the ufo question. Some things I can appreciate being kept secret but I think we all know we could be living on free energy and solve many world issues... things like this.
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 11, 2023 5:24:09 GMT
purr likes this
Post by cotes777 on Jul 11, 2023 5:24:09 GMT
Hi purr, everyone -
I watched a hearing by a couple of congress members and a person named Dr Kirkpatrick. So, it seems that the Chinese balloon-spy probe [disgrace/joke] has been a pretext by Congress to open a group study/probe into ufos. Upon listening to Dr Kirkpatrick, he seems to genuinely looking into the cases that are presented to him. Getting into realistic methods by which one would use to investigate. That alone was refreshing. He explained to some degree that the group's overall goal was to incorporate and normalize into the protocol system a process of reporting and processing any ufo cases within the dept of defense and other fed organizations.
This is interesting. This to me seems a rational approach to national security from a public viewpoint. The problem is; our private sector knows everything and says nothing while our public sector asks everything and knows nothing. Looks like an effort to just start from scratch.
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Jul 26, 2023 1:23:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by purr on Jul 26, 2023 17:47:59 GMT
Thanks Swamp! I watched Chris Lehto's livestream, easiest since I was following him. And... HOLY CRAFT! Did we see history change? I guess yes. I was especially on the lookout for back-pedalling or sabotage, but the testimony held true. Grusch confirmed that the US recovered Non Human Biologicals and with that response 7/26/2023 has become Disclosure Day. purr
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 26, 2023 19:24:57 GMT
purr likes this
Post by swamprat on Jul 26, 2023 19:24:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by HAL on Jul 27, 2023 9:57:41 GMT
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 27, 2023 15:17:08 GMT
Post by swamprat on Jul 27, 2023 15:17:08 GMT
I asked my pal Billy Cox what he thought of the hearing. Here is his response:
Far exceeded my expectations. More importantly, it was great to see congress on the same page for once. I'm a bit more optimistic now.
|
|
|
Post by purr on Jul 27, 2023 23:37:18 GMT
I asked my pal Billy Cox what he thought of the hearing. Here is his response:
Far exceeded my expectations. More importantly, it was great to see congress on the same page for once. I'm a bit more optimistic now. I was deeply impressed by the three witnesses. Surprised too by the bi-partisan cooperation in this hearing. I felt it wonderful to be alive on this historic day. Imo we have seen a small but REAL step forward in the disclosure process. In fairness America and the rest of the world is now at the 1947 point in UFO history without the cover-up. Even though I'm on a healthy Keto diet, I popped open a bottle of Casa del Diablo to celebrate! purr
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 29, 2023 11:44:36 GMT
X likes this
Post by HAL on Jul 29, 2023 11:44:36 GMT
Assuming that Congress was to follow up on the hearing. And were to subpoena the people Grusch said he would name, How far do you think it could go 'up the chain' before someone was to say 'Sorry, this is so secret that we can override your request' ? Certainly it would have to be way above what a President is told.
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 29, 2023 13:16:04 GMT
Post by purr on Jul 29, 2023 13:16:04 GMT
Assuming that Congress was to follow up on the hearing. And were to subpoena the people Grusch said he would name, How far do you think it could go 'up the chain' before someone was to say 'Sorry, this is so secret that we can override your request' ? Certainly it would have to be way above what a President is told. HAL, 'they' whoever they are, someone way up on the SAP food chain, are not playing Defense, no waiting game. I would reconstruct it as follows: sometime over the past two years, when it became apparent David Grusch was like a dog with a bone, he was not gonna let go of his repeated request for 'access'/being read in to any and all Special Access Programs for which an almost endless list, most of it worthless/misdirection, passed his desk, INCLUDING THE SEXIEST OF ALL (retrieval), and they pushed back some, guy didn't buckle under threats and pressure, then the determination was made they couldn't discredit/dishonorably discharge/shut up/kill him.... Such elements in the intelligence community at that point knew it was going to come to the Congressional Hearings we witnessed July 26. Had to happen some time. To assert control of the situation a selection was made of SAPs and UAP information that were to be sacrificed, declassified and made public. This selection is the approved packet of disclosure disseminated in the MoCs questions and Graves', Grusch' and Fravor's replies, including much of the details shared in 'closed session' yet to be released. This sacrifice imo is intended to keep a deeper layer of special access programs securely out of the public's eye for decades to come. Works like a magician's sleight of hand and misdirection. "Look here! ( not there) while I move things around out of sight". We'll probably end up with a pigeon shitting on our head and missing all money & jewelry and wondering how the hell did this happen...... purr P.S. Oops.. HAL I almost forgot to answer your core question 'how high up will this go'. Best personal opinion. At this stage the cat's out of the bag. I believe Biden had to be fully briefed well before the hearing. POTUS knows the full scope of the UAP problem, stuff we are not going to hear ever. He has several versions of the "WE ARE NOT ALONE" speech ready, depending on how miffed and blabby the US lawmakers will become over diverted government funding and evading oversight. Leave it to our American friends to politicize the disclosure of alien visitation. Biden and Trump will now be in a race for being seen as the most transparent, UAP disclosure candidate. The UAP/UFO Community voting block has become a force to be reckoned with.
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 29, 2023 19:09:38 GMT
purr and X like this
Post by HAL on Jul 29, 2023 19:09:38 GMT
Presidents come and go. So whoever is running the 'super-secret' show will not be telling them anything. Probably keeping the info they pass to them to whatever is the local military risk at the moment. We have an ongoing situation of classified docs being inappropriately moved. So the POTUS of the day (which ever it is) will not be put in a position where he/she can spill the beans. Same goes for our PM.
It remains to be seen what comes out of the next layer of discussion.
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 30, 2023 15:06:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by moksha on Jul 30, 2023 15:06:38 GMT
Presidents come and go. So whoever is running the 'super-secret' show will not be telling them anything. Probably keeping the info they pass to them to whatever is the local military risk at the moment. We have an ongoing situation of classified docs being inappropriately moved. So the POTUS of the day (which ever it is) will not be put in a position where he/she can spill the beans. Same goes for our PM. It remains to be seen what comes out of the next layer of discussion. Hal, here is a old clip. m.youtube.com/watch?v=j6iE62jovMoThere is no mention of JROD exopaedia.org/J-RodMW
|
|
|
D-Day
Jul 30, 2023 16:35:44 GMT
Post by HAL on Jul 30, 2023 16:35:44 GMT
Presidents come and go. So whoever is running the 'super-secret' show will not be telling them anything. Probably keeping the info they pass to them to whatever is the local military risk at the moment. We have an ongoing situation of classified docs being inappropriately moved. So the POTUS of the day (which ever it is) will not be put in a position where he/she can spill the beans. Same goes for our PM. It remains to be seen what comes out of the next layer of discussion. Hal, here is a old clip. m.youtube.com/watch?v=j6iE62jovMoThere is no mention of JROD exopaedia.org/J-RodMW Thanks for the links. The top one seems to be just pre-Biden (or just after he was elected) and the J-ROD reference comes with the following quote...
...Those mistakes that they want to remedy would lead to a cataclysm in 2012, which is what they are trying to avoid...
So it must be quite old.
Somehow I don't think Trump would have been quite the right person to be given this kind of news.
As for a base on Mars ? No way.
|
|